CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING
Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Artery StenosesComputed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography and Correlation With Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina
W. Bob Meijboom, MD*, ,
Carlos A.G. Van Mieghem, MD*, ,
Niels van Pelt, MD*, ,
Annick Weustink, MD*, ,
Francesca Pugliese, MD*, ,
Nico R. Mollet, MD, PhD*, ,
Eric Boersma, PhD*,
Eveline Regar, MD, PhD*,
Robert J. van Geuns, MD, PhD*, ,
Peter J. de Jaegere, MD, PhD*,
Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FACC*,
Gabriel P. Krestin, MD, PhD and
Pim J. de Feyter, MD, PhD, FACC*, ,*
* Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Manuscript received October 18, 2007;
revised manuscript received April 28, 2008,
accepted May 6, 2008.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Pim J. de Feyter, Erasmus MC, Department of Cardiology and Radiology, Room Hs 227, s Gravendijkwal 230, P.O. Box 2040, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. (Email: p.j.defeyter{at}erasmusmc.nl).
Objectives: We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive visual (computed tomography coronary angiography [CTCA]) and quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography (QCT) to predict the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis, using intracoronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.
Background: It has been demonstrated that CTCA provides excellent diagnostic sensitivity for identifying coronary stenoses, but may lack accurate delineation of the hemodynamic significance.
Methods: We investigated 79 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent both 64-slice or dual-source CTCA and FFR measurement of discrete coronary stenoses. CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA), and QCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), were performed to determine the severity of a stenosis that was compared with FFR measurements. A significant anatomical or functional stenosis was defined as 50% diameter stenosis or an FFR <0.75. Stented segments and bypass grafts were not included in the analysis.
Results: A total of 89 stenoses were evaluated of which 18% (16 of 89) had an FFR <0.75. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA, QCT, CCA, and QCA to detect a hemodynamically significant coronary lesion was 49%, 71%, 61%, and 67%, respectively. Correlation between QCT and QCA with FFR measurement was weak (R values of –0.32 and –0.30, respectively). Correlation between QCT and QCA was significant, but only moderate (R = 0.53; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The anatomical assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses determined by visual CTCA, CCA, or QCT or QCA does not correlate well with the functional assessment of FFR. Determining the hemodynamic significance of an angiographically intermediate stenosis remains relevant before referral for revascularization treatment.
Key Words: coronary artery disease computed tomography coronary angiography fractional flow reserve quantification
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CCA = conventional coronary angiogram | | CT = computed tomography | | CTCA = computed tomography coronary angiogram | | FFR = fractional flow reserve | | QCA = quantitative coronary angiography | | QCT = quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography |
|
Related Article
-
Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 52: A29-A30.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Ko, J. D. Cameron, I. T. Meredith, M. Leung, P. R. Antonis, A. Nasis, M. Crossett, S. A. Hope, S. J. Lehman, J. Troupis, et al.
Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve
Eur. Heart J.,
January 1, 2012;
33(1):
67 - 77.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Montgomery, J. J. Puthumana, J. M. Fox, and K. O. Ogunyankin
Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,
December 13, 2011;
(2011)
jer282v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sen, J. Escaned, I. S. Malik, G. W. Mikhail, R. A. Foale, R. Mila, J. Tarkin, R. Petraco, C. Broyd, R. Jabbour, et al.
Development and Validation of a New Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave-Intensity Analysis: Results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 7, 2011;
(2011)
j.jacc.2011.11.003v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B.-K. Koo, A. Erglis, J.-H. Doh, D. V. Daniels, S. Jegere, H.-S. Kim, A. Dunning, T. DeFrance, A. Lansky, J. Leipsic, et al.
Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms: Results From the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 1, 2011;
58(19):
1989 - 1997.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Liga, C. Marini, M. Coceani, E. Filidei, M. Schlueter, M. Bianchi, G. Rossi, S. Pardini, P. Salvadori, O. Parodi, et al.
Structural Abnormalities of the Coronary Arterial Wall--in Addition to Luminal Narrowing--Affect Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve
J. Nucl. Med.,
November 1, 2011;
52(11):
1704 - 1712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Naya, V. L. Murthy, R. Blankstein, A. Sitek, J. Hainer, C. Foster, M. Gaber, J. M. Fantony, S. Dorbala, and M. F. Di Carli
Quantitative Relationship Between the Extent and Morphology of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque and Downstream Myocardial Perfusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 18, 2011;
58(17):
1807 - 1816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Bamberg, A. Becker, F. Schwarz, R. P. Marcus, M. Greif, F. von Ziegler, R. Blankstein, U. Hoffmann, W. H. Sommer, V. S. Hoffmann, et al.
Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis: Incremental Diagnostic Value of Dynamic CT-based Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Radiology,
September 1, 2011;
260(3):
689 - 698.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Di Carli and V. L. Murthy
Cardiac PET/CT for the Evaluation of Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
RadioGraphics,
September 1, 2011;
31(5):
1239 - 1254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. De Bruyne and C. Van Mieghem
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: CONFIRMations and Perspectives
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 16, 2011;
58(8):
861 - 862.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Techasith and R. C. Cury
Stress Myocardial CT Perfusion: An Update and Future Perspective
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
August 1, 2011;
4(8):
905 - 916.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Wijns and J. D. Schuijf
Nonobstructive Coronary Plaque Matters
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 26, 2011;
58(5):
520 - 521.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Kim, D.-W. Park, J.-Y. Lee, W.-J. Kim, S.-C. Yun, J.-M. Ahn, H. G. Song, J.-H. Oh, J. S. Park, S.-J. Kang, et al.
Impact of Angiographic Complete Revascularization After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Circulation,
May 31, 2011;
123(21):
2373 - 2381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. W. Chow, M. Kass, O. Gagne, L. Chen, Y. Yam, A. Dick, and G. A. Wells
Can Differences in Corrected Coronary Opacification Measured With Computed Tomography Predict Resting Coronary Artery Flow?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 15, 2011;
57(11):
1280 - 1288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Arbab-Zadeh and J. Hoe
Quantification of Coronary Arterial Stenoses by Multidetector CT Angiography in Comparison With Conventional Angiography: Methods, Caveats, and Implications
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
February 1, 2011;
4(2):
191 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. H. J. Pijls and P. A. L. Tonino
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 4, 2011;
57(1):
116 - 116.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schoenhagen and E. Nagel
Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Outcome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
January 1, 2011;
4(1):
62 - 64.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Gould, R. Kirkeeide, and N. P. Johnson
Coronary Branch Steal: Experimental Validation and Clinical Implications of Interacting Stenosis in Branching Coronary Arteries
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
November 1, 2010;
3(6):
701 - 709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Morton, A. Schuster, D. Perera, and E. Nagel
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to guide complex revascularization in stable coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2010;
31(18):
2209 - 2215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kajander, E. Joutsiniemi, M. Saraste, M. Pietila, H. Ukkonen, A. Saraste, H. T. Sipila, M. Teras, M. Maki, J. Airaksinen, et al.
Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease
Circulation,
August 10, 2010;
122(6):
603 - 613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-T. Ho, K.-C. Chua, E. Klotz, and C. Panknin
Stress and Rest Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Evaluation of Complete Time-Attenuation Curves With Dual-Source CT
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
August 1, 2010;
3(8):
811 - 820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Mark, D. S. Berman, M. J. Budoff, J. J. Carr, T. C. Gerber, H. S. Hecht, M. A. Hlatky, J. M. Hodgson, M. S. Lauer, J. M. Miller, et al.
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 8, 2010;
55(23):
2663 - 2699.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, D. B. Mark, D. S. Berman, M. J. Budoff, J. J. Carr, T. C. Gerber, H. S. Hecht, M. A. Hlatky, J. M. Hodgson, M. S. Lauer, et al.
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents
Circulation,
June 8, 2010;
121(22):
2509 - 2543.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Friedrich
Testing for Myocardial Ischemia: The End of Surrogates?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
April 1, 2010;
3(4):
385 - 387.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. F. Donati, H. Scheffel, P. Stolzmann, S. Baumuller, A. Plass, S. Leschka, and H. Alkadhi
Combined Cardiac CT and MRI for the Comprehensive Workup of Hemodynamically Relevant Coronary Stenoses
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
April 1, 2010;
194(4):
920 - 926.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Min, L. J. Shaw, and D. S. Berman
The Present State of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Process in Evolution
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 9, 2010;
55(10):
957 - 965.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Mark and D. F. Kong
Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography: What's the Prognosis?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 9, 2010;
55(10):
1029 - 1031.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 2, 2010;
55(5):
483 - 495.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Kern and H. Samady
Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 19, 2010;
55(3):
173 - 185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. de Feijter and C. Schultz
Chapter 12 Coronary computed tomography for the interventionalist
Oxford Textbook of Interventional Cardiology,
January 1, 2010;
1(1):
med-9780199569083-chapter - med-9780199569083-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Blankstein, L. D. Shturman, I. S. Rogers, J. A. Rocha-Filho, D. R. Okada, A. Sarwar, A. V. Soni, H. Bezerra, B. B. Ghoshhajra, M. Petranovic, et al.
Adenosine-Induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Dual-Source Cardiac Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 15, 2009;
54(12):
1072 - 1084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Achenbach
Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion: Steps, Questions, and Layers
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 15, 2009;
54(12):
1085 - 1087.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Gould
Does Coronary Flow Trump Coronary Anatomy?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
August 1, 2009;
2(8):
1009 - 1023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Sarno, I. Decraemer, P. K. Vanhoenacker, B. De Bruyne, M. Hamilos, T. Cuisset, E. Wyffels, J. Bartunek, G. R. Heyndrickx, and W. Wijns
On the Inappropriateness of Noninvasive Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Trigger Coronary Revascularization: A Comparison With Invasive Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
June 1, 2009;
2(6):
550 - 557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. B. Meijboom, M. F.L. Meijs, J. D. Schuijf, M. J. Cramer, N. R. Mollet, C. A.G. van Mieghem, K. Nieman, J. M. van Werkhoven, G. Pundziute, A. C. Weustink, et al.
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 12, 2009;
53(19):
1825 - 1826.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Hendel
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department: Antagonist Viewpoint
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
May 1, 2009;
2(3):
264 - 275.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ramcharitar, F. Pugliese, C. Schultz, J. Ligthart, P. de Feyter, H. Li, N. Mollet, M. van de Ent, P. W. Serruys, and R. J. van Geuns
Integration of Multislice Computed Tomography With Magnetic Navigation Facilitates Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Without Additional Contrast Agents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 3, 2009;
53(9):
741 - 746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, J. J. Bax, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, S. M. Narayan, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2008
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 27, 2009;
53(4):
373 - 398.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. de Feyter, S. Achenbach, and K. Nieman
CHAPTER 6 Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,
January 1, 2009;
2(1):
med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|