CLINICAL RESEARCH: PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Mortality and Events With Statin TreatmentsA Network Meta-Analysis Involving More Than 65,000 Patients
Edward J. Mills, MSc, PhD, LLM*,*,
Beth Rachlis, MSc ,
Ping Wu, MBBS, MSc||,
Philip J. Devereaux, MD, PhD*, ,
Paul Arora, MSc¶ and
Dan Perri, BScPharm, MD, FRCP(C) ,
* Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Department of Healthcare and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|| Department of Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
¶ Centre for Global Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Manuscript received July 1, 2008;
revised manuscript received August 20, 2008,
accepted August 25, 2008.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Edward J. Mills, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada (Email: millsej{at}mcmaster.ca).
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in primary prevention of cardiovascular events.
Background: The role of statins is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical events and mortality. Little is known of their role in primary cardiovascular event prevention.
Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches of 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2008. We contacted study investigators and maintained a comprehensive bibliography of statin studies. We included randomized trials of at least 12-month duration in predominantly primary prevention populations. Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression, calculated optimal information size, and conducted a mixed-treatment comparison analysis.
Results: We included 20 randomized clinical trials. We pooled 19 trials (n = 63,899) for all-cause mortality and found a relative risk (RR) of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 0.99, p = 0.03 [I2 = 5%, 95% CI: 0% to 51%]). Eighteen trials (n = 59,469) assessed cardiovascular deaths (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.98, p = 0.01 [I2 = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 41%]). Seventeen trials (n = 53,371) found an RR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95, p = 0.004 [I2 = 61%, 95% CI: 38% to 77%]) for major cardiovascular events, and 17 trials (n = 52,976) assessed myocardial infarctions (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.95, p = 0.01 [I2 = 59%, 95% CI: 24% to 74%]). Incidence of cancer was not elevated in 10 trials (n = 45,469) (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.11, p = 0.59 [I2 = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 46%]), nor was rhabdomyolysis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.25 to 3.83, p = 0.96 [I2 = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 40%]). Our analysis included a sufficient sample to reliably answer our primary outcome of CVD mortality.
Conclusions: Statins have a clear role in primary prevention of CVD mortality and major events.
Key Words: statins meta-analysis primary prevention
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CHD = coronary heart disease | | CI = confidence interval | | CrI = credibility interval | | CVD = cardiovascular disease | | HDL = high-density lipoprotein | | IQR = interquartile range | | LDL = low-density lipoprotein | | MI = myocardial infarction | | OIS = optimal information size | | RR = relative risk |
|
Related Article
-
Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 52: A36.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Khan, M. P. Hamilton, D. I. Mundy, S. C. Chua, and P. E. Scherer
Impact of Simvastatin on Adipose Tissue: Pleiotropic Effects in Vivo
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2009;
150(12):
5262 - 5272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Rossi and H. L. McLeod
The pharmacogenetics of statin therapy: when the body aches, the mind will follow.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 20, 2009;
54(17):
1617 - 1618.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J J Brugts, T Yetgin, S E Hoeks, A M Gotto, J Shepherd, R G J Westendorp, A J M de Craen, R H Knopp, H Nakamura, P Ridker, et al.
The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ,
June 30, 2009;
338(jun30_1):
b2376 - b2376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Muldoon
Trial evidence for statin-based primary prevention remains dubious.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 16, 2009;
53(24):
2312 - 2312.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Mills and P. J. Devereaux
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 16, 2009;
53(24):
2312 - 2313.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H Song and T. A Gray
Management of type 2 diabetes and lipids: a critique of the NICE guidelines 2008
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease,
March 1, 2009;
9(2):
69 - 74.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|