CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART FAILURE
Continental Differences in Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Worsening Heart FailureResults From the EVEREST (Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study with Tolvaptan) Program
John E.A. Blair, MD*,
Faiez Zannad, MD ,
Marvin A. Konstam, MD, FACC ,
Thomas Cook, PhD ,
Brian Traver, MS ,
John C. Burnett, Jr, MD||,
Liliana Grinfeld, MD, FACC¶,
Holly Krasa, MS#,
Aldo P. Maggioni, MD**,
Cesare Orlandi, MD, FACC#,
Karl Swedberg, MD, PhD, FACC ,
James E. Udelson, MD, FACC ,
Christopher Zimmer, MD#,
Mihai Gheorghiade, MD, FACC*,* for the EVEREST Investigators
* Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Nancy, France
Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
|| Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
¶ Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
# Otsuka Maryland Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland
** Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardioligi Ospedalieri Research Center, Florence, Italy
 Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
Manuscript received April 15, 2008;
revised manuscript received June 27, 2008,
accepted July 10, 2008.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Mihai Gheorghiade, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 201 East Huron Street, Galter 10-240, Chicago, Illinois 60611 (Email: m-gheorghiade{at}northwestern.edu).
Objectives: Our aim was to examine continental and regional differences in baseline characteristics and post-discharge clinical outcomes in the EVEREST (Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study with Tolvaptan) trial.
Background: Continental and regional differences in clinical trials of acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) have not been well studied.
Methods: We analyzed data from the EVEREST trial, which randomized 4,133 patients hospitalized for worsening (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction 40% to oral tolvaptan, a vasopressin antagonist, or placebo and followed for a median of 9.9 months. Baseline characteristics, mortality, and outcomes were analyzed across North America (n = 1,251), South America (n = 688), Western Europe (564 patients), and Eastern Europe (n = 1,619).
Results: There were major differences between the 4 groups in the severity, etiology, and management of HF. Unadjusted 1-year mortality and cardiovascular mortality/HF hospitalization were 30.4% and 52.5% in North America, 27.2% and 41.6% in South America, 27.1% and 47.3% in Western Europe, and 20.5% and 35.3% in Eastern Europe. After adjustment, South American patients had the highest overall mortality (hazard ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.15 to 1.76), while Eastern European patients had the lowest cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization rate (hazard ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.97), compared with patients in North America.
Conclusions: Major continental and regional differences in HF severity, etiology, and management exist among AHFS patients, resulting in varied post-discharge outcomes, despite pre-defined selection criteria. These differences should be taken into account when planning global trials in AHFS. (Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study with Tolvaptan [EVEREST]; NCT00071331)
Key Words: heart failure regional differences outcomes
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AHFS = acute heart failure syndromes | | BNP = B-type natriuretic peptide | | CI = confidence interval | | CV = cardiovascular | | HF = heart failure | | HR = hazard ratio | | ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
|
Related Articles
-
Global Differences in the Outcome of Heart Failure: Implications for Clinical Practice
- Philip A. Poole-Wilson
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 52: 1649-1651.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 52: A28.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Poole-Wilson
Global Differences in the Outcome of Heart Failure: Implications for Clinical Practice
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 11, 2008;
52(20):
1649 - 1651.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|