This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maruyama, T. Articles by Yoshizumi, T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Maruyama, T. Articles by Yoshizumi, T. Related Collections Related Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Radiation Dose Reduction and Coronary Assessability of Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography

Comparison With Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Helical Scan

Takao Maruyama, MD, PhD^_*,_*, Masanori Takada, MD^_*, Toshiaki Hasuike, MD^_*, Atsushi Yoshikawa, MD^_*, Eiji Namimatsu, RT and Tohru Yoshizumi, RT^_*,

Department of Cardiology, Kawasaki Hospital, Kobe, Japan
Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Hospital, Kobe, Japan
Department of Internal Medicine and Molecular Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Manuscript received February 12, 2008; revised manuscript received June 23, 2008, accepted July 10, 2008.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Takao Maruyama, Department of Cardiology, Kawasaki Hospital, 3-3-1, Higashiyama, Hyogo, Kobe 652-0042, Japan (Email: maruyama_takao{at}kawasaki-hospital-kobe.or.jp).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation dose and coronary assessability of a prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated scan by 64-slice multidetector (row) computed tomography (MDCT)-coronary angiography (CA) compared with a retrospective ECG-gated helical scan.

Background: The 64-slice MDCT-CA has been widely used; however, a high radiation dose by 64-slice MDCT-CA has been reported. Prospective ECG-gated scan using "step-and-shoot" protocol can reduce radiation exposure effectively.

Methods: MDCT-CA was performed in 229 consecutive patients. Fifty-six patients were excluded because of higher heart rates of >65 beats/min; of patients with heart rates 65 beats/min, 97 were analyzed by helical scan with tube current modulation and 76 were analyzed by prospective gating. Coronary assessability and diagnostic accuracy were investigated in comparison with selective CA as the gold standard. Radiation doses were evaluated in both protocols.

Results: Coronary assessability of helical scan was 95.5% (1,303 of 1,364 segments), while that of prospective gating was 96.6% (1,053 of 1,089 segments), showing similar coronary assessability (p = 0.14). Sensitivity and specificity for coronary obstructive and occlusive lesions in the assessable segments were 97.0% (162 of 167) and 97.6% (1,109 of 1,136) by helical scan, while those of prospective gating were 96.4% (81 of 84, p = 0.84) and 98.5% (955 of 969, p = 0.12), respectively. Effective doses of helical scan and prospective gating were 21.1 ± 6.7 mSv and 4.3 ± 1.3 mSv, respectively (p < 0.0001), showing that prospective gating decreased radiation dose by 79% compared with that of helical scan.

Conclusions: MDCT-CA by prospective gating showed equivalent coronary assessability and diagnostic accuracy with decreased radiation dose in comparison with a retrospective ECG-gated helical scan with tube current modulation.

Key Words: CT coronary angiography • dose reduction • prospective gating • step-and-shoot

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CA = coronary angiography   CT = computed tomography   CTDIvol = computed tomography dose index volume   HR = heart rate(s)   MDCT = multidetector (row) computed tomography

Related Articles

Low-Dose Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With Prospective Triggering: A Promise for the Future

Philipp A. Kaufmann
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 52: 1456-1457. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Achenbach, M. Marwan, D. Ropers, T. Schepis, T. Pflederer, K. Anders, A. Kuettner, W. G. Daniel, M. Uder, and M. M. Lell Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition Eur. Heart J., November 5, 2009; (2009) ehp470v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B A Herzog, C A Wyss, L Husmann, O Gaemperli, I Valenta, V Treyer, U Landmesser, and P A Kaufmann First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography Heart, October 15, 2009; 95(20): 1656 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach, V. Dilsizian, C. M. Kramer, and W. A. Zoghbi The Year in Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 774 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Hoffmann and F. Bamberg Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 251 - 263. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Takakuwa, E. J. Halpern, E. L. Gingold, D. C. Levin, and F. S. Shofer Radiation Dose in a "Triple Rule-Out" Coronary CT Angiography Protocol of Emergency Department Patients Using 64-MDCT: The Impact of ECG-Based Tube Current Modulation on Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 866 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, J. J. Bax, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, S. M. Narayan, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2008. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 27, 2009; 53(4): 373 - 398. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Kaufmann Low-Dose Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With Prospective Triggering: A Promise for the Future J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 28, 2008; 52(18): 1456 - 1457. [Full Text] [PDF]