|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:618-626, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.056 © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


* Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Department of Medical Statistics and Bio-Informatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Manuscript received June 11, 2007; revised manuscript received September 13, 2007, accepted September 17, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Martin J. Schalij, Department of Cardiology, C5-P, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands. (Email: m.j.schalij{at}lumc.nl).
Objectives: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Background: There is inconsistent and limited evidence about the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in STEMI patients.
Methods: A single-blind, single-center, randomized study was performed to compare bare-metal stents (BMS) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in 310 STEMI patients. The primary end point was in-segment late luminal loss (LLL) at 9 months. Secondary end points included late stent malapposition (LSM) at 9 months as determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging and clinical events at 12 months.
Results: In-segment LLL was 0.68 ± 0.57 mm in the BMS group and 0.12 ± 0.43 mm in the SES group with a mean difference of 0.56 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.68 mm (p < 0.001). Late stent malapposition at 9 months was present in 12.5% BMS patients and in 37.5% SES patients (p < 0.001). Event-free survival at 12 months was 73.6% in BMS patients and 86.0% in SES patients (p = 0.01). The target-vessel-failure-free survival was 84.7% in the BMS group and 93.0% in the SES group (p = 0.02), mainly because of a higher target lesion revascularization rate in BMS patients (11.3% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.006). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were not different.
Conclusions: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in STEMI patients is associated with a favorable midterm clinical and angiographic outcome compared with treatment with BMS. However, LSM raises concern about the long-term safety of SES in STEMI patients (MISSION!; ISRCTN62825862).
| ||||||||||||||
Related Article
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: A25-A26.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Mauri, T. S. Silbaugh, P. Garg, R. E. Wolf, K. Zelevinsky, A. Lovett, M. R. Varma, Z. Zhou, and S.-L. T. Normand Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., September 25, 2008; 359(13): 1330 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Shishehbor, R. Amini, L. P.J. Oliveria, I. M. Singh, P. Kelly, D. L. Bhatt, S. R. Kapadia, S. G. Ellis, P. L. Whitlow, and S. J. Brener Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Treating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 227 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. van der Hoeven, S.-S. Liem, J. Dijkstra, S. C. Bergheanu, H. Putter, M. L. Antoni, D. E. Atsma, M. Bootsma, K. Zeppenfeld, J. W. Jukema, et al. Stent Malapposition After Sirolimus-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Acute and 9-Month Intravascular Ultrasound Results of the MISSION! Intervention Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 192 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |