|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:607-614, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.064 © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Section of Cardiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Manuscript received June 8, 2007; revised manuscript received August 17, 2007, accepted August 20, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Robert J. Applegate, Section of Cardiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1045. (Email: bapplega{at}wfubmc.edu).
Objective: The aim was to compare 2-year outcomes with the routine use of drug-eluting stents (DES) (>75% "off-label") with a comparable group treated with bare-metal stents (BMS).
Background: Safety concerns >1 year from implantation have been raised about DES used "off-label." There are limited data comparing DES and BMS in "off-label" patients.
Methods: Clinical outcomes (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], all-cause mortality) were assessed in 1,164 consecutive patients who received BMS in the year before introduction of DES at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and 1,285 consecutive patients who received DES after it became our routine choice. "On-label" stent use was defined as treatment for a single de novo lesion <30 mm, without recent MI or other major illnesses.
Results: At 2 years, the hazard ratio for DES compared with BMS for nonfatal MI or death was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 0.95), for all-cause mortality 0.71 (0.54 to 0.92), and stent thrombosis (ST) 0.97 (0.49 to 1.91). "On-label" stent procedures were associated with lower risk of MI, death, and ST than "off-label" stent procedures. For "off-label" stent procedures, the hazard ratio for DES compared with BMS for nonfatal MI or death was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.98), all-cause mortality 0.72 (0.54 to 0.94), and ST 0.91 (0.46 to 1.80). The hazard of nonfatal MI or death was similar or lower for DES than BMS in high-risk subgroups, including renal failure and recent MI.
Conclusions: The routine clinical use of drug-eluting stents for "off-label" indications was associated with lower nonfatal MI and death at 2 years than in a comparable group of patients treated with BMS.
| ||||||||
Related Articles
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: 615-617.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: A25-A26.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Austin, K. G. Oldroyd, A. McConnachie, R. Slack, H. Eteiba, A. D. Flapan, K. P. Jennings, R. J. Northcote, A. C.H. Pell, I. R. Starkey, et al. Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Off-Label Indications: A Propensity Score-Matched Outcome Study Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Talbert Overview of advances in cardiovascular disease treatment and prevention: The evolving role of antiplatelet therapy Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2008; 65(13_Supplement_5): S1 - S5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Valgimigli, G. Campo, G. Percoco, L. Bolognese, C. Vassanelli, S. Colangelo, N. de Cesare, A. E. Rodriguez, M. Ferrario, R. Moreno, et al. Comparison of Angioplasty With Infusion of Tirofiban or Abciximab and With Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting or Uncoated Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The MULTISTRATEGY Randomized Trial JAMA, April 16, 2008; 299(15): 1788 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines Off-label use of drug-eluting stents putting it in perspective. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 12, 2008; 51(6): 615 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |