This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Galiuto, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Galiuto, L. Related Collections Related Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The Extent of Microvascular Damage During Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Is Superior to Other Known Indexes of Post-Infarct Reperfusion in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling

Results of the Multicenter AMICI Study

Leonarda Galiuto, MD, PhD, FACC^_*,_*, Barbara Garramone, MD^_*, Antonio Scarà, MD^_*, Antonio G. Rebuzzi, MD^_*, Filippo Crea, MD, FACC^_*, Giuseppe La Torre, MD, Msc, Stefania Funaro, MD, Mariapina Madonna, MD, Francesco Fedele, MD, Luciano Agati, MD on behalf of the AMICI Investigators

^_* Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Hygiene, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
Division of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Campobasso, Italy
Department of Cardiology, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Manuscript received June 12, 2007; revised manuscript received August 24, 2007, accepted September 17, 2007.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Leonarda Galiuto, Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. (Email: lgaliuto{at}rm.unicatt.it).

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the value of the extent of microvascular damage as assessed with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in the prediction of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as compared with established clinical and angiographic parameters of reperfusion.

Background: Early identification of post-percutaneous coronary intervention microvascular dysfunction may help in tailoring appropriate pharmacological interventions in high-risk patients. The ideal method to establish effective microvascular reperfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention remains to be determined.

Methods: A total of 110 patients with first successfully reperfused STEMI were enrolled in the AMICI (Acute Myocardial Infarction Contrast Imaging) multicenter study. After reperfusion, peak creatine kinase, ST-segment reduction, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and myocardial blush grade were calculated. We evaluated perfusion defects with MCE by using continuous infusion of Sonovue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) in real-time imaging. The endocardial length of contrast defect (CD) on day 1 after reperfusion was calculated. Wall motion score index, the extent of wall motion abnormalities, LV end-diastolic volume, and ejection fraction after reperfusion and at follow-up also were calculated.

Results: Of 110 patients, 25% evolved in LV remodeling and 75% did not. Although peak creatine kinase, ST-segment reduction >70%, and myocardial blush grade were not different between groups, in patients exhibiting LV remodeling, TIMI flow grade 3 was less frequent (p < 0.001), wall motion score index was greater (p < 0.001), and CD was greater (p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, only TIMI flow grade <3 and CD with a cutoff of >25% were independently associated with LV remodeling. Among patients with TIMI flow grade 3, CD was the only independent variable associated with LV remodeling.

Conclusions: Among patients with TIMI flow grade 3, the extent of microvascular damage, detected and quantitated by MCE, is the most powerful independent predictor of LV remodeling after STEMI as compared with persistent ST-segment elevation and myocardial blush grade.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CD = contrast defect   CSI = contrast score index   ECG = electrocardiogram   EDV = end-diastolic volume   EF = ejection fraction   ESV = end-systolic volume   IRA = infarct-related artery   LV = left ventricular   MBG = myocardial blush grade   MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography   MD = microvascular damage   PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention   ROC = receiver-operating characteristic   TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction   WM = wall motion   WMSI = wall motion score index

Related Articles

Advances in the Assessment of No-Reflow After Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Now That We Can Diagnose It, What Do We Do About It?

Paul A. Grayburn and James W. Choi
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: 566-568. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Galiuto, G. Locorotondo, L. Paraggio, A. R. De Caterina, A. M. Leone, E. Fedele, S. Barchetta, I. Porto, L. Natale, A. G. Rebuzzi, et al. Characterization of microvascular and myocardial damage within perfusion defect area at myocardial contrast echocardiography in the subacute phase of myocardial infarction Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, October 16, 2011; (2011) jer190v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Kloner No-Reflow Phenomenon: Maintaining Vascular Integrity Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2011; 16(3-4): 244 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Funaro, L. Galiuto, F. Boccalini, S. Cimino, E. Canali, F. Evangelio, L. DeLuca, L. Paraggio, A. Mattatelli, L. Gnessi, et al. Determinants of microvascular damage recovery after acute myocardial infarction: results from the acute myocardial infarction contrast imaging (AMICI) multi-centre study Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, April 1, 2011; 12(4): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Galiuto, R. Senior, and H. Becher Chapter 7 Contrast echocardiography The EAE Textbook of Echocardiography, March 1, 2011; 1(1): med-9780199599639-chapter - med-9780199599639-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. A. Flachskampf, M. Schmid, C. Rost, S. Achenbach, A. N. DeMaria, and W. G. Daniel Cardiac imaging after myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2011; 32(3): 272 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Flachskampf and W. G. Daniel Cardiac imaging in the patient with chest pain: echocardiography Heart, July 1, 2010; 96(13): 1063 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ndrepepa, K. Tiroch, M. Fusaro, D. Keta, M. Seyfarth, R. A. Byrne, J. Pache, P. Alger, J. Mehilli, A. Schomig, et al. 5-Year Prognostic Value of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 25, 2010; 55(21): 2383 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Porter and F. Xie Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Contrast Ultrasound J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2010; 3(2): 176 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Francone, C. Bucciarelli-Ducci, I. Carbone, E. Canali, R. Scardala, F. A. Calabrese, G. Sardella, M. Mancone, C. Catalano, F. Fedele, et al. Impact of Primary Coronary Angioplasty Delay on Myocardial Salvage, Infarct Size, and Microvascular Damage in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insight From Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2009; 54(23): 2145 - 2153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S A Mollema, G Nucifora, and J J Bax Prognostic value of echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction Heart, November 1, 2009; 95(21): 1732 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Niccoli, F. Burzotta, L. Galiuto, and F. Crea Myocardial No-Reflow in Humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 281 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach, V. Dilsizian, C. M. Kramer, and W. A. Zoghbi The Year in Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 774 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Weyman The Year in Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1558 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Funaro, G. La Torre, M. Madonna, L. Galiuto, A. Scara, A. Labbadia, E. Canali, A. Mattatelli, F. Fedele, F. Alessandrini, et al. Incidence, determinants, and prognostic value of reverse left ventricular remodelling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Acute Myocardial Infarction Contrast Imaging (AMICI) multicenter study Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2009; 30(5): 566 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Senior Outcome after primary percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: role of microcirculatory perfusion--a crucial piece in the puzzle Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2009; 30(5): 530 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Senior, H. Becher, M. Monaghan, L. Agati, J. Zamorano, J. L. Vanoverschelde, and P. Nihoyannopoulos Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 194 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, J. J. Bax, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, S. M. Narayan, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2008 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 27, 2009; 53(4): 373 - 398. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Di Mario and G. Ferrante Embolization: The "Dark Side" of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 277 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Grayburn and J. W. Choi Advances in the Assessment of No-Reflow After Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Now That We Can Diagnose It, What Do We Do About It? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 566 - 568. [Full Text] [PDF]