|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:538-545, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.054 © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,*
,








* Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
San Antonio Endovascular and Heart Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
American Heart of Poland, Ustron, Poland
Upper-Silesian Heart Centre, Katowice, Poland
|| Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
¶ Silesian School of Engineering, Katowice, Poland
# Bryn Mawr and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Manuscript received March 21, 2007; revised manuscript received September 10, 2007, accepted September 17, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Pawel E. Buszman, Katowice 40-635, Ziolowa 45/47, Poland. (Email: pbuszman{at}ka.onet.pl).
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the early and late results of percutaneous and surgical revascularization of left main coronary artery stenosis.
Background: Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenting is being investigated as an alternative to bypass surgery.
Methods: We randomly assigned 105 patients with ULMCA stenosis to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 52 patients) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 53 patients). The primary end point was the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 12 months after the intervention. Secondary end points included 30-day major adverse events (MAE), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), length of hospitalization, target vessel failure (TVF), angina severity and exercise tolerance after 1 year, and total and MACCE-free survival.
Results: A significant increase in LVEF at the 12-month follow-up was noted only in the PCI group (3.3 ± 6.7% after PCI vs. 0.5 ± 0.8% after CABG; p = 0.047). Patients performed equally well on stress tests, and angina status improved similarly in the 2 groups. PCI was associated with a lower 30-day risk of MAE (p < 0.006) and MACCE (p = 0.03) and shorter hospitalizations (p = 0.0007). Total and MACCE-free 1-year survival was comparable. Left main TVF was similar in the 2 groups. During the 28.0 ± 9.9-month follow-up, there were 3 deaths in the PCI group and 7 deaths in the CABG group (p = 0.08).
Conclusions: Patients with ULMCA disease treated with PCI had favorable early outcomes in comparison with the CABG group. At 1 year, LVEF had improved significantly only in the PCI group. After more than 2 years, MACCE-free survival was similar in both groups with a trend toward improved survival after PCI. (Study of Unprotected Left Main Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery [LE MANS study]; NCT00375063).
| ||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Meliga, M. Valgimigli, P. Buszman, and P. W. Serruys Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: The Endless Debate J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 12, 2008; 52(7): 582 - 584. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Randomized Study of Left-Main Stenting Journal Watch Cardiology, March 5, 2008; 2008(305): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Taggart, S. Kaul, W. E. Boden, T. B. Ferguson Jr, R. A. Guyton, M. J. Mack, P. T. Sergeant, R. J. Shemin, P. K. Smith, and S. Yusuf Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 885 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |