CLINICAL RESEARCH: CLINICAL TRIAL
Carotid Artery Revascularization in High-Surgical-Risk Patients Using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EX/EZ1-Year Outcomes in the BEACH Pivotal Group
Sriram S. Iyer, MD, FACC*,*,
Christopher J. White, MD, FACC ,
L. Nelson Hopkins, MD ,
Barry T. Katzen, MD ,
Robert Safian, MD, FACC||,
Mark H. Wholey, MD¶,
William A. Gray, MD, FACC#,
Rocco Ciocca, MD**,
William B. Bachinsky, MD, FACC ,
Gary Ansel, MD ,
James D. Joye, DO, FACC ,
Mary E. Russell, MD, FACC** for the BEACH Investigators
* Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana
University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida
|| William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
¶ Pittsburgh Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
# Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
** Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts
 Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
 Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
 El Camino Hospital, Mountain View, California.
Manuscript received July 23, 2007;
revised manuscript received September 4, 2007,
accepted September 17, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sriram Iyer, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, Black Hall, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10021. (Email: SRIUAB{at}aol.com).
Objectives: The multicenter, single-arm BEACH (Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients) evaluated outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTENT plus FilterWire EX/EZ Emboli Protection System (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts).
Background: Carotid artery stent (CAS) placement offers a less invasive alternative for high-risk surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients.
Methods: The trial enrolled 480 pivotal patients who were candidates for carotid revascularization but considered high surgical risk due to pre-specified anatomic criteria and/or medical comorbidities. The primary end point (all stroke, death, or Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non–Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death through 1 year) was compared with a proportionally weighted objective performance criterion (OPC) of 12.6% for published surgical endarterectomy results in similar patients, plus a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 4%.
Results: Among pivotal patients, 41.2% were at high surgical risk due to comorbid risk factors, and 58.8% due to anatomic risk factors; 76.7% were asymptomatic with flow-limiting carotid stenosis >80%. At 1 year, the composite primary end point occurred in 8.9% (40 of 447), with a repeat revascularization rate of 4.7%. With an upper 95% confidence limit of 11.5% for the primary composite end point, the BEACH trial results met the pre-specified criteria for noninferiority relative to the calculated OPC plus noninferiority margin (16.6%) for historical surgical CEA outcomes in similar patients (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority).
Conclusions: The BEACH trial results demonstrate that CAS with the WALLSTENT plus FilterWire embolic protection is non-inferior (equivalent or better than) to CEA at 1-year in high-surgical-risk patients (Boston Scientific Embolic Protection, Inc. [EPI]: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients [BEACH];
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
&rank=1">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00316108
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
?term=NCT00316108&rank=1; NCT00316108
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
).
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAS = carotid artery stent/stenting | | CCA = common carotid artery | | CEA = carotid endarterectomy | | CI = confidence interval | | FDA = Food and Drug Administration | | ICA = internal carotid artery | | MI = myocardial infarction | | NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale | | OPC = objective performance criterion | | PSV = peak systolic velocity |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 2, 2009;
53(22):
2080 - 2097.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T.L. Chiam, G. S. Roubin, G. Panagopoulos, S. S. Iyer, R. M. Green, C. Brennan, and J. J. Vitek
One-Year Clinical Outcomes, Midterm Survival, and Predictors of Mortality After Carotid Stenting in Elderly Patients
Circulation,
May 5, 2009;
119(17):
2343 - 2348.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Wakhloo, M. J. Deleo III, and M. M. Brown
Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology
Stroke,
May 1, 2009;
40(5):
e305 - e312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, J. J. Bax, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, S. M. Narayan, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2008.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 27, 2009;
53(4):
373 - 398.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Jahromi, R. P. Tummala, J. Yamamoto, E. I. Levy, A. H. Siddiqui, and L. N. Hopkins
EARLY CAROTID STENTING FOR SYMPTOMATIC STENOSIS AND INTRALUMINAL THROMBUS PRESENTING WITH STROKE
Neurology,
November 25, 2008;
71(22):
1831 - 1833.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Chaer and M. S. Makaroun
Current Indications for Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy,
September 1, 2008;
20(3):
239 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|