JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:427-434, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.045
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iyer, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Iyer, S. S.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CLINICAL TRIAL

Carotid Artery Revascularization in High-Surgical-Risk Patients Using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EX/EZ

1-Year Outcomes in the BEACH Pivotal Group

Sriram S. Iyer, MD, FACC*,*, Christopher J. White, MD, FACC{dagger}, L. Nelson Hopkins, MD{ddagger}, Barry T. Katzen, MD§, Robert Safian, MD, FACC||, Mark H. Wholey, MD, William A. Gray, MD, FACC#, Rocco Ciocca, MD**, William B. Bachinsky, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, Gary Ansel, MD{ddagger}{ddagger}, James D. Joye, DO, FACC§§, Mary E. Russell, MD, FACC** for the BEACH Investigators

* Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
{dagger} Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana
{ddagger} University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
§ Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida
|| William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
Pittsburgh Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
# Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
** Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts
{dagger}{dagger} Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
{ddagger}{ddagger} Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
§§ El Camino Hospital, Mountain View, California.

Manuscript received July 23, 2007; revised manuscript received September 4, 2007, accepted September 17, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sriram Iyer, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, Black Hall, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10021. (Email: SRIUAB{at}aol.com).

Objectives: The multicenter, single-arm BEACH (Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients) evaluated outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTENT plus FilterWire EX/EZ Emboli Protection System (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts).

Background: Carotid artery stent (CAS) placement offers a less invasive alternative for high-risk surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients.

Methods: The trial enrolled 480 pivotal patients who were candidates for carotid revascularization but considered high surgical risk due to pre-specified anatomic criteria and/or medical comorbidities. The primary end point (all stroke, death, or Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non–Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death through 1 year) was compared with a proportionally weighted objective performance criterion (OPC) of 12.6% for published surgical endarterectomy results in similar patients, plus a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 4%.

Results: Among pivotal patients, 41.2% were at high surgical risk due to comorbid risk factors, and 58.8% due to anatomic risk factors; 76.7% were asymptomatic with flow-limiting carotid stenosis >80%. At 1 year, the composite primary end point occurred in 8.9% (40 of 447), with a repeat revascularization rate of 4.7%. With an upper 95% confidence limit of 11.5% for the primary composite end point, the BEACH trial results met the pre-specified criteria for noninferiority relative to the calculated OPC plus noninferiority margin (16.6%) for historical surgical CEA outcomes in similar patients (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority).

Conclusions: The BEACH trial results demonstrate that CAS with the WALLSTENT plus FilterWire embolic protection is non-inferior (equivalent or better than) to CEA at 1-year in high-surgical-risk patients (Boston Scientific Embolic Protection, Inc. [EPI]: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients [BEACH]; [ClinicalTrials.gov] &rank=1">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00316108 [ClinicalTrials.gov] ?term=NCT00316108&rank=1; NCT00316108 [ClinicalTrials.gov] ).

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAS = carotid artery stent/stenting
  CCA = common carotid artery
  CEA = carotid endarterectomy
  CI = confidence interval
  FDA = Food and Drug Administration
  ICA = internal carotid artery
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
  OPC = objective performance criterion
  PSV = peak systolic velocity







HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.