JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:307-314, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.041
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannitsis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Giannitsis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study for Quantification of Infarct Size Comparing Directly Serial Versus Single Time-Point Measurements of Cardiac Troponin T

Evangelos Giannitsis, MD*,1,4, Henning Steen, MD*,4, Kerstin Kurz, MD*, Boris Ivandic, MD*, Anke C. Simon, MD*, Simon Futterer, MD*, Christian Schild, MD*, Peter Isfort, MD*, Allan S. Jaffe, MD, FACC{dagger},3,* and Hugo A. Katus, MD, FACC*,2

* Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
{dagger} Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota.

Manuscript received March 23, 2007; revised manuscript received August 10, 2007, accepted September 7, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Allan S. Jaffe, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, CV Division, Gonda 5, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. (Email: Jaffe.Allan{at}mayo.edu).

Objectives: We compared single-point cardiac troponin T (cTnT) measurements with parameters from serial sampling during 96 h after acute myocardial infarction with magnetic resonance imaging measured infarct mass.

Background: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) allows exact quantification of myocardial infarct size. Clinically, measurement of cardiac biomarkers is a more convenient alternative.

Methods: The CE-MRI infarct mass was determined 4 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 31 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 30 non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. All single-point, peak, and integrated area under the curve (AUC) cTnT values were plotted against CE-MRI infarct mass.

Results: All single-point and serial cTnT values were significantly higher in STEMI than in NSTEMI (p < 0.01) patients. Except for the admission values, all single-point values on any of the first 4 days, peak cTnT and AUC cTnT were found to correlate comparably well with infarct mass. Among single-point measurements, cTnT on day 4 (cTnTD4) showed highest correlation and performed as well as peak cTnT or AUC cTnT (r = 0.66 vs. r = 0.65 vs. r = 0.69). Receiver-operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that cTnTD4 >0.84 µg/l predicted infarct mass above median as well as peak cTnT >1.57 µg/l or AUC cTnT (receiver-operator characteristic for AUC: 0.839 vs. 0.866 vs. 0.893). However, estimation of infarct mass with cTnTD4, peak cTnT, and AUC cTnT was worse in patients with NSTEMI (r = 0.36, r = 0.5, r = 0.36) than in STEMI (r = 0.75 vs. r = 0.65 vs. r = 0.76).

Conclusions: All single-point cTnTs, except on admission, give a good estimation of infarct size and perform as well as peak cTnT or AUC cTnT. Infarct estimation by single-point measurements, particularly cTnTD4, may gain clinical acceptance because the measurement is easy and inexpensive.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  AUC = area under the curve
  CE-MRI = contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
  CI = confidence interval
  CK-MB = creatine kinase-MB fraction
  CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  cTnI/T = cardiac troponin I or T
  MR = magnetic resonance
  MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
  NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  ROC = receiver-operator characteristic
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography
  STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. S. Jaffe
Key Issues in the Developing Synergism between Cardiovascular Imaging and Biomarkers
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1432 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. Leuschner, J. Li, S. Goser, L. Reinhardt, R. Ottl, P. Bride, J. Zehelein, G. Pfitzer, A. Remppis, E. Giannitsis, et al.
Absence of auto-antibodies against cardiac troponin I predicts improvement of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2008; 29(16): 1949 - 1955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
S. Chia, F. Senatore, O. C. Raffel, H. Lee, F. J. Th. Wackers, and I.-K. Jang
Utility of Cardiac Biomarkers in Predicting Infarct Size, Left Ventricular Function, and Clinical Outcome After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2008; 1(4): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
V. C. Vasile, L. Babuin, E. Giannitsis, H. A. Katus, and A. S. Jaffe
Relationship of MRI-Determined Infarct Size and cTnI Measurements in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2008; 54(3): 617 - 619.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.