JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:1959-1964, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.044
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donald, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Deanfield, J. E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Donald, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Deanfield, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: ASSESSING VASCULAR FUNCTION

Methodological Approaches to Optimize Reproducibility and Power in Clinical Studies of Flow-Mediated Dilation

Ann E. Donald, AVS*,*, Julian P. Halcox, MD, MA, FRCP*, Marietta Charakida, MD, PhD*, Clare Storry, BSc, AVS*, Sharon M.L. Wallace, BA, DipHE, RN*, Tim J. Cole, ScD{dagger}, Peter Friberg, MD, PhD* and John E. Deanfield, BA, BChir, MB, FRCP*

* Vascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Centre for Pediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

Manuscript received October 31, 2007; revised manuscript received January 7, 2008, accepted February 5, 2008.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Ms. Ann E. Donald, Vascular Physiology Unit, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom. (Email: A.Donald{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk).

Objectives: Our aim was to determine reproducibility of the flow-mediated dilation (FMD) response profile, and discriminatory ability of the components.

Background: Brachial FMD is widely used to study conduit artery endothelial function. Automated B-mode image edge detection (B-ED) provides a full response profile. Reproducibility and biological relevance of these additional components have not been fully explored.

Methods: Forty-two healthy adults underwent FMD using B-ED repeated at fixed time intervals up to 3 months. The FMD profile was assessed for diameter changes, area under the curve, and time course. Measures were compared in 25 adults with hypercholesterolemia, 25 subjects with diabetes, and 50 matched control subjects.

Results: The maximum change in FMD was the most reproducible (coefficient of variation = 9.8%, 10.6%, 6.6%, and 9.2% at 4 to 6 h, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, respectively). Most of the variability occurred between subjects rather than within. All FMD measures except time course were significantly reduced in hypercholesterolemia and diabetes. Power curves were generated to indicate the appropriate number of subjects for parallel and crossover study designs.

Conclusions: Maximum FMD percentage change from baseline is the most reproducible of the response curve measures and best identifies those with risk factors. Flow-mediated dilation measured by B-ED is robust and practical to assess the effect of interventions on endothelial function in clinical trials.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  A-WT = A-mode wall tracking
  B-ED = B-mode edge detection
  CV = coefficient of variation
  FMD = flow-mediated dilation
  FMDmax = maximum flow-mediated dilation percentage change from baseline
  NO = nitric oxide
  T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus


Related Articles

Listening to the Endothelium: A Story of Signal and Noise
Robert Vogel
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: 1965-1966. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: A31-A32. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Vogel
Listening to the Endothelium: A Story of Signal and Noise
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 20, 2008; 51(20): 1965 - 1966.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.