This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Delgado, V. Articles by Bax, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Delgado, V. Articles by Bax, J. J. Related Collections Related Article

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Assessment of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony by Speckle Tracking Strain Imaging

Comparison Between Longitudinal, Circumferential, and Radial Strain in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Manuscript received September 17, 2007; revised manuscript received January 30, 2008, accepted February 4, 2008.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jeroen J. Bax, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. (Email: j.j.bax{at}lumc.nl).

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of each type of strain for left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony assessment and its predictive value for a positive response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Furthermore, changes in extent of LV dyssynchrony for each type of strain were evaluated during follow-up.

Background: Different echocardiographic techniques have been proposed for assessment of LV dyssynchrony. The novel 2-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking strain analysis technique can provide information on radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS), and longitudinal strain (LS).

Methods: In 161 patients, 2D echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 6 months of CRT. Extent of LV dyssynchrony was calculated for each type of strain. Response to CRT was defined as a decrease in LV end-systolic volume 15% at follow-up.

Results: At follow-up, 88 patients (55%) were classified as responders. Differences in baseline LV dyssynchrony between responders and nonresponders were noted only for RS (251 ± 138 ms vs. 94 ± 65 ms; p < 0.001), whereas no differences were noted for CS and LS. A cut-off value of radial dyssynchrony 130 ms was able to predict response to CRT with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 80%. In addition, a significant decrease in extent of LV dyssynchrony measured with RS (from 251 ± 138 ms to 98 ± 92 ms; p < 0.001) was demonstrated only in responders.

Conclusions: Speckle tracking radial strain analysis constitutes the best method to identify potential responders to CRT. Reduction in LV dyssynchrony after CRT was only noted in responders.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   2D = 2-dimensional   AS-P = anteroseptal to posterior   CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy   CS = circumferential strain   LS = longitudinal strain   LV = left ventricle/ventricular   RS = radial strain   SDt6s = standard deviation of time to peak-systolic strain of 6 segments   SDt12s = standard deviation of time to peak-systolic strain of 12 segments   TDI = tissue Doppler imaging

Related Article

Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: A31-A32. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Marsan, J. J.M. Westenberg, C. Ypenburg, R. J. van Bommel, S. Roes, V. Delgado, L. F. Tops, R. J. van der Geest, E. Boersma, A. de Roos, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony and scar tissue Eur. Heart J., July 4, 2009; (2009) ehp280v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Nesser, V. Mor-Avi, W. Gorissen, L. Weinert, R. Steringer-Mascherbauer, J. Niel, L. Sugeng, and R. M. Lang Quantification of left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRI Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2009; 30(13): 1565 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Delgado, J. J. Bax, and E. E. van der Wall Towards assessment of left ventricular mechanics in true three dimensions Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2009; 30(13): 1554 - 1555. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. F. Tops, D. W. Den Uijl, V. Delgado, N. A. Marsan, K. Zeppenfeld, E. Holman, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, and J. J. Bax Long-Term Improvement in Left Ventricular Strain After Successful Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 249 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Hawkins, M. C. Petrie, M. I. Burgess, and J. J.V. McMurray Selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the fallacy of echocardiographic dyssynchrony. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 26, 2009; 53(21): 1944 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. A. Breithardt Echocardiographic patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy betting on a dead horse? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 544 - 547. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Boogers, S. D. Van Kriekinge, M. M. Henneman, C. Ypenburg, R. J. Van Bommel, E. Boersma, P. Dibbets-Schneider, M. P. Stokkel, M. J. Schalij, D. S. Berman, et al. Quantitative Gated SPECT-Derived Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Detects Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony and Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 718 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Ciampi, L. Pratali, R. Citro, M. Piacenti, B. Villari, and E. Picano Identification of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy by contractile reserve during stress echocardiography Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 489 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Weyman The year in echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1558 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. F. Tops and J. J. Bax The Year in Imaging Related to Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 498 - 510. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Korosoglou, D. Lossnitzer, D. Schellberg, A. Lewien, A. Wochele, T. Schaeufele, M. Neizel, H. Steen, E. Giannitsis, H. A. Katus, et al. Strain-Encoded Cardiac MRI as an Adjunct for Dobutamine Stress Testing: Incremental Value to Conventional Wall Motion Analysis Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 132 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Lafitte, P. Reant, A. Zaroui, E. Donal, A. Mignot, H. Bougted, H. Belghiti, P. Bordachar, A. Deplagne, J. Chabaneix, et al. Validation of an echocardiographic multiparametric strategy to increase responders patients after cardiac resynchronization: a multicentre study Eur. Heart J., January 9, 2009; (2009) ehn582v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D'Andrea, P. Caso, R. Scarafile, L. Riegler, G. Salerno, F. Castaldo, R. Gravino, R. Cocchia, L. Del Viscovo, G. Limongelli, et al. Effects of global longitudinal strain and total scar burden on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 58 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Marsan, O. A. Breithardt, V. Delgado, M. Bertini, and L. F. Tops Predicting response to CRT. The value of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii73 - iii79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gorcsan III Is the magnet a better crystal ball for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2008; 1(5): 569 - 571. [Full Text] [PDF]