CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
Clopidogrel 600-Mg Double Loading Dose Achieves Stronger Platelet Inhibition Than Conventional RegimensResults From the PREPAIR Randomized Study
Philippe L. LAllier, MD*,
Grégory Ducrocq, MD,
Nicolas Pranno, MD,
Stéphane Noble, MD,
Reda Ibrahim, MD,
Jean C. Grégoire, MD,
Fabian Azzari, MD,
Anna Nozza, MSc,
Colin Berry, MD, PhD,
Serge Doucet, MD,
Benoit Labarthe, PharmD,
Pierre Théroux, MD,
Jean-Claude Tardif, MD for the PREPAIR Study Investigators
Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Manuscript received August 3, 2007;
revised manuscript received November 23, 2007,
accepted December 2, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Philippe L. LAllier, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8. (Email: philippe.lallier{at}icm-mhi.org).
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the level of platelet inhibition achieved by 3 different clopidogrel loading regimens in patients undergoing elective angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention when appropriate.
Background: Optimal platelet inhibition is a key therapeutic goal for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although 600 mg has been described as the maximum absorbed dose when given as a single bolus, the effects of 2 boluses given 24 h apart have not been described.
Methods: Patients (n = 148) were randomly assigned to one of 3 regimens: Group A, clopidogrel 300 mg the day before ( 15 h) + 75 mg the morning of the procedure; Group B, clopidogrel 600 mg the morning of the procedure ( 2 h); and Group C, clopidogrel 600 mg the day before ( 15 h) and 600 mg the morning of the procedure ( 2 h). Blood samples were obtained at baseline and immediately before angiography. Peak and late platelet aggregation were measured in platelet rich plasma, with researchers blinded to treatment allocation.
Results: There was a consistent difference favoring Group C in all aggregation parameters. Percent inhibition in Groups A, B, and C was 31.4%, 29.0%, and 49.5%, respectively, for peak aggregation (5 µmol/l adenosine diphosphate; p < 0.0001) and 54.1%, 57.7%, and 81.1%, respectively, for late aggregation (p < 0.0001). Similar striking reductions were observed when 20 µmol/l adenosine diphosphate was used. All comparisons between Group C and the other 2 groups were statistically significant, and those between Groups A and B were not.
Conclusions: Clopidogrel 600-mg double bolus achieves greater platelet inhibition than conventional single loading doses.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ADP = adenosine diphosphate | | Aggpeak
= peak aggregation | | Agg6min
= late aggregation | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | PPP = platelet-poor plasma | | PRP = platelet-rich plasma |
|
Related Article
-
Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51: A26.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Dangas, R. Mehran, G. Guagliumi, A. Caixeta, B. Witzenbichler, J. Aoki, J. Z. Peruga, B. R. Brodie, D. Dudek, R. Kornowski, et al.
Role of Clopidogrel Loading Dose in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty: Results From the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 6, 2009;
54(15):
1438 - 1446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Collet and G. Montalescot
Review: Platelet Function Testing and Implications for Clinical Practice
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
September 1, 2009;
14(3):
157 - 169.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L Bonello, A De Labriolle, M Scheinowitz, G Lemesle, P Roy, D H Steinberg, T L Pinto Slottow, R Pakala, A D Pichard, P Barragan, et al.
Emergence of the concept of platelet reactivity monitoring of response to thienopyridines
Heart,
August 1, 2009;
95(15):
1214 - 1219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 2, 2009;
53(22):
2080 - 2097.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Tousoulis, A. Briasoulis, S. S Dhamrait, C. Antoniades, and C. Stefanadis
Effective platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel: where are we now?
Heart,
May 1, 2009;
95(10):
850 - 858.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, J. J. Bax, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, S. M. Narayan, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2008.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 27, 2009;
53(4):
373 - 398.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gladding, M. Webster, I. Zeng, H. Farrell, J. Stewart, P. Ruygrok, J. Ormiston, S. El-Jack, G. Armstrong, P. Kay, et al.
The Antiplatelet Effect of Higher Loading and Maintenance Dose Regimens of Clopidogrel: The PRINC (Plavix Response in Coronary Intervention) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
December 1, 2008;
1(6):
612 - 619.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. O. Williams and J. D. Abbott
What to Do With Patients Receiving Long-Term Clopidogrel: Reload or Relax?
Circulation,
September 16, 2008;
118(12):
1219 - 1222.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Collet, J. Silvain, A. Landivier, M.-L. Tanguy, G. Cayla, A. Bellemain, N. Vignolles, S. Gallier, F. Beygui, A. Pena, et al.
Dose Effect of Clopidogrel Reloading in Patients Already on 75-mg Maintenance Dose: The Reload With Clopidogrel Before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) Study
Circulation,
September 16, 2008;
118(12):
1225 - 1233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C Coons and S. Battistone
2007 Guideline Update for Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Focus on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies
Ann. Pharmacother.,
July 1, 2008;
42(7):
989 - 1001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|