|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:243-252, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.035
(Published online 28 June 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,2
* Department of Cardiology, Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield/Birmingham, West Midlands, England
Medtronic Inc., Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Manuscript received November 20, 2006; revised manuscript received March 9, 2007, accepted March 13, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Francisco Leyva, Department of Cardiology, Good Hope Hospital, Rectory Road, Sutton Coldfield/Birmingham, West Midlands B75 7RR, United Kingdom. (Email: francisco.leyva{at}heartofengland.nhs.uk).
Objectives: We aimed to assess a novel measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, a cardiovascular magnetic resonance-tissue synchronization index (CMR-TSI), in patients with heart failure (HF). A further aim was to determine whether CMR-TSI predicts mortality and major cardiovascular events (MCE) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Background: Cardiac dyssynchrony is a predictor of mortality in patients with HF. The unparalleled spatial resolution of CMR may render CMR-TSI a predictor of clinical benefit after CRT.
Methods: In substudy A, CMR-TSI was assessed in 66 patients with HF (age 60.8 ± 10.8 years, LV ejection fraction 23.9 ± 12.1% [mean ± SD]) and 20 age-matched control subjects. In substudy B, CMR-TSI was assessed in relation to clinical events in 77 patients with HF and with a QRS
120 ms undergoing CRT.
Results: In analysis A, CMR-TSI was higher in patients with HF and a QRS <120 ms (79.5 ± 31.2 ms, p = 0.0003) and in those with a QRS
120 ms (105.9 ± 55.8 ms, p < 0.0001) than in control subjects (21.2 ± 8.1 ms). In analysis B, a CMR-TSI
110 ms emerged as an independent predictor of the composite end points of death or unplanned hospitalization for MCE (hazard ratio [HR] 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51 to 4.34, p = 0.0002) or death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.23 to 4.14, p = 0.0060) as well as death from any cause (HR: 2.6; 95% CI 1.29 to 6.73, p = 0.0061) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.82; 95% CI 1.63 to 16.5, p = 0.0007) over a mean follow-up of 764 days.
Conclusions: Myocardial dyssynchrony assessed by CMR-TSI is a powerful independent predictor of mortality and morbidity after CRT.
| ||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Saeed, A. Martin, P. Ursell, L. Do, M. Bucknor, C. B. Higgins, and D. Saloner MR Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion, Viability, and Function after Intramyocardial Transfer of VM202, a New Plasmid Human Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Ischemic Swine Myocardium Radiology, August 5, 2008; (2008) 2483071579. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Prinzen and A. Auricchio Is echocardiographic assessment of dyssynchrony useful to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy?: Echocardiography Is Not Useful Before Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy if QRS Duration Is Available Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2008; 1(1): 70 - 78. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Kass An epidemic of dyssynchrony: but what does it mean? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 12 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh Mechanical dyssynchrony in congestive heart failure: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 18 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |