|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:953-960, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.066
(Published online 20 August 2007). © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








,2,*
* Cardiac MRI PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Division of Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Research and Education Institute, Torrance, California
Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
|| Ciccarone Preventive Cardiology Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Manuscript received January 23, 2007; revised manuscript received March 8, 2007, accepted March 12, 2007.
* Reprints requests and correspondence: Dr. Matthew J. Budoff, Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, 1124 West Carson Street, RB2, Torrance, California 90502. (Email: Budoff{at}ucla.edu).
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of coronary artery calcium (CAC), a known marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, in a large, ethnically diverse cohort of 14,812 patients for the prediction of all-cause mortality.
Background: Disparities in case fatality rates for heart disease among ethnic groups are well known. In 2001, rates of death from heart disease were 30% higher among African Americans (AA) than non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Some of this variability may be due to differing pathophysiological mechanisms and effects of underlying atherosclerosis.
Methods: Ten-year death rates from all causes (total deaths = 505) were compared using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models in AA (n = 637), Hispanic (HS, n = 1,334), Asian (AS, n = 1,065), and NHW (n = 11,776) populations.
Results: Ethnic minority patients were generally younger (0.3 to 4 years), more often persons with diabetes (p < 0.0001), hypertensive (p < 0.0001), and female (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of CAC scores
100 was highest in NHW (31%) and lowest for HS (18%) (p < 0.0001). Overall survival was 96%, 93%, and 92% for AS, NHW, and HS, respectively, as compared with 83% for AA (p < 0.0001). When comparing prognosis by CAC scores in ethnic minorities as compared with NHW, relative risk ratios were highest for AA with CAC scores
400 exceeding 16.1 (p < 0.0001). Hispanics with CAC scores
400 had relative risk ratios from 7.9 to 9.0, whereas AS with CAC scores
1,000 had relative risk ratios 6.6-fold higher than NHW (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Consistent with population evidence, AA with increasing burden of subclinical coronary artery disease were the highest-risk ethnic minority population. These data support a growing body of evidence noting substantial differences in cardiovascular risk by ethnicity.
| |||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. S. Douglas, R. F. Redberg, R. S. Blumenthal, and M. Ambrose Imaging for Coronary Risk Assessment: Ready for Prime Time? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 263 - 265. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Rumberger The Ethnic Rosetta Stone: Translating Risk Factors, Plaque Scores, and Mortality J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 961 - 963. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |