Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:930-932, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.025 (Published online 20 August 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2007.05.025v1
50/10/930    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginsburg, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ginsburg, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, J. J.

VIEWPOINT

Taking Cardiovascular Genetic Association Studies to the Next Level

Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, MD, PhD*,{dagger},*, Svati H. Shah, MD, MHS{dagger} and Jeanette J. McCarthy, PhD*,{ddagger}

* Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Durham, North Carolina
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
{ddagger} Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Manuscript received April 20, 2007; revised manuscript received May 11, 2007, accepted May 23, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Box 3382, Durham, North Carolina 27710. (Email: geoffrey.ginsburg{at}duke.edu).

Genetic information is beginning to have a direct impact on patient care and it is important that cardiologists appreciate the value and approaches to associating genetic variation and health outcomes. Genetic associations should be based on compelling genetic and biological hypotheses and should be statistically sound so as to reduce the possibility of "false discovery" in the setting of testing multiple hypotheses. Study designs should clearly define cases and controls and measurement of phenotypes. Finally, findings should be replicated in at least 1 independent cohort. Consideration of these principles should provide insight into disease biology based on genetic findings and encourage their meaningful adoption into clinical practice.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CRP = C-reactive protein
  DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid
  LD = linkage disequilibrium
  SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism






 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement