Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:1457-1463
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caron, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lekieffre, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caron, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lekieffre, J.

Comparative study of encainide and disopyramide in chronic ventricular arrhythmias: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study

JF Caron, CC Libersa, AR Kher, S Kacet, H Wanszelbaum, BA Dupuis, JM Poirier, and JP Lekieffre

Ten patients suffering from chronic premature ventricular complexes (greater than 60/h) were treated orally in a double-blind crossover study with encainide (50 mg three times a day) and disopyramide (200 mg three times a day), with five 7 day study periods: survey, placebo, encainide or disopyramide, washout placebo and disopyramide or encainide. At the end of each 7 day period, a 12 lead electrocardiogram, a 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiogram and a treadmill exercise test were performed. Blood levels of encainide and its metabolites and of disopyramide were measured at the end of each treatment (steady state). Drug efficacy was assessed by: 1) more than 80% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes per 24 hours, and 2) absence of ventricular tachycardia. Encainide was effective in four patients (complete suppression of premature ventricular complexes) and ineffective in five. One patient who showed a 92% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes developed sustained ventricular tachycardia after 24 hours of treatment. Disopyramide was effective in three patients (greater than 80% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes) and ineffective in seven patients. With encainide, the percent increase in PR, QRS and QT interval duration was, respectively: 32.7 (p less than 0.001), 30.8 (p less than 0.001) and 10.6% (p less than 0.01). With disopyramide this increase was not significant. Despite the variability of drug blood levels, a relation between blood levels and suppression of premature ventricular complexes on the 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was found with encainide, but not with disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement