JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:1407-1413
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chilson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Prystowsky, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chilson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Prystowsky, E.

Electrophysiologic effects and clinical efficacy of oral propafenone therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia

DA Chilson, JJ Heger, DP Zipes, KF Browne, and EN Prystowsky

The effects of the antiarrhythmic agent propafenone were evaluated in 25 patients with recurrent symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Oral propafenone was given to a maximal dose of 300 mg every 8 hours. Ten of the 25 patients developed side effects or had inadequate suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias during propafenone therapy. Electrophysiologic studies were performed before and during drug therapy on the 15 patients who had a satisfactory clinical response. Propafenone increased the PR interval from 168 +/- 46 to 188 +/- 25 ms (p less than 0.007), the HV interval from 47 +/- 10 to 65 +/- 13 ms (p less than 0.005), the shortest atrial pacing cycle length to maintain 1:1 atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction from 385 +/- 44 to 436 +/- 42 ms (p less than 0.005), the ventricular effective refractory period from 231 +/- 17 to 255 +/- 19 ms (p less than 0.001) and the ventricular functional refractory period from 260 +/- 15 to 278 +/- 17 ms (p less than 0.002). Before propafenone therapy, all 15 patients had ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed ventricular stimulation. During propafenone treatment, 12 patients still had ventricular tachycardia induced, and the tachycardia cycle length significantly increased from 236 +/- 44 to 374 +/- 103 ms (p less than 0.001). Ten patients were considered to have satisfactory electrophysiologic response to propafenone on the basis of either the inability to initiate ventricular tachycardia or a marked increase in ventricular tachycardia cycle length associated with lack of symptoms during the induced tachycardia. These patients were discharged receiving propafenone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
B. N. Singh
Review : Sotalol: Current Status and Expanding Indications
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(1): 49 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
M. Valderrabano and B. N. Singh
Review : Electrophysiologic and Antiarrhythmic Effects of Propafenone: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(3): 183 - 198.
[PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.