JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:1292-1301
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waspe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waspe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, J.

Prediction of sudden death and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in survivors of complicated myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation using a maximum of three ventricular extrastimuli

LE Waspe, D Seinfeld, A Ferrick, SG Kim, JA Matos, and JD Fisher

The prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias induced by programmed electrical stimulation was evaluated in 50 survivors of acute myocardial infarction complicated by a major new conduction disturbance (38 patients), congestive heart failure (33 patients) or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (22 patients), alone or in combination. Programmed stimulation was performed in patients in stable condition 7 to 36 days (mean 16) after infarction using one to three extrastimuli at four times diastolic threshold at a maximum of two right ventricular sites. Two groups were identified by the response to programmed stimulation: 17 patients with sustained (greater than 15 seconds) or nonsustained (greater than 7 beats but less than or equal to 15 seconds) ventricular tachycardia (group I), and 33 patients with 0 to 7 intraventricular reentrant complexes in response to maximal stimulation efforts (group II). Group I patients had a higher incidence of anterior infarction than that of patients in group II (71 versus 42%), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean 0.35 versus 0.48) and were more often treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (47 versus 18%, p less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in the occurrence of congestive failure, new conduction disorders or sustained ventricular arrhythmias with infarction, or in the proportions treated with a beta-receptor blocking agent, coronary bypass grafting or a permanent pacemaker. Total cardiac mortality was 24% during a mean follow-up period of 23 months and did not differ between groups; however, the response to programmed stimulation identified a group at high risk of late sudden death or spontaneous ventricular tachycardia: 7 (41%) of 17 group I patients compared with 0 of 33 group II patients (p less than 0.001). The induction of sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia identified all patients who died suddenly or had spontaneous tachycardia (sensitivity 100%), but triple extrastimuli were required to induce prognostically significant arrhythmias in five of these seven patients; the specificity of this protocol was only 57%. When the clinical variables of the group were evaluated individually, the response to programmed stimulation had a stronger association with occurrence of late sudden death than did any other factor (Fisher's exact test, p less than 0.001); however, a type II error could not be excluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. E. Buxton, G. E. Hafley, M. H. Lehmann, M. Gold, M. O'Toole, A. Tang, J. Coromilas, B. Hook, N. J. Stamato, and K. L. Lee
Prediction of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Inducible by Programmed Stimulation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : Utility of Clinical Variables
Circulation, April 13, 1999; 99(14): 1843 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Roden
Risks and Benefits of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 22, 1994; 331(12): 785 - 791.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
V. Dor, M. Sabatier, F. Montiglio, P. Rossi, A. Toso, and M. Di Donato
Results of nonguided subtotal endocardiectomy associated with left ventricular reconstruction in patients with ischemic ventricular arrhythmias
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1994; 107(5): 1301 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
W. Hueb, G. Bellotti, E. Sosa, J. A. Ramires, P. L. da Luz, and F. Pileggi
Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced by Programmed Ventricular Stimulation After Uncomplicated Myocardial Infarction
Angiology, July 1, 1992; 43(7): 578 - 584.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
P. C. Nalos, M. R. Myers, E. S. Gang, T. Peter, and W. J. Mandel
Analytic Reviews: Electrophysiologic Testing in the Intensive Care Unit
J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 1987; 2(5): 241 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.