cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:1198-1204
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, J.

Long-term assessment of unipolar and bipolar stimulation and sensing thresholds using a lead configuration programmable pacemaker

AP Nielsen, WR Cashion, WH Spencer, HJ Norton, GW Divine, TD Schuenemeyer, and JC Griffin

Acute and long-term pacing thresholds were measured prospectively in 74 patients with a unipolar/bipolar multiprogrammable pacemaker. At implantation, mean current threshold was 0.48 +/- 0.16 mA with unipolar mode and 0.55 +/- 0.16 mA bipolar mode (p less than 0.01). R wave amplitude at implantation was 7.78 +/- 2.4 mV with unipolar and 7.67 +/- 2.1 mV in bipolar mode (p = NS). During long-term follow-up (mean 9.3 months; range 3 to 24), no clinically significant differences in pacing or sensing thresholds were observed between bipolar and unipolar configurations. Lead configuration was changed 23 times in 11 patients. Symptomatic myopotential inhibition was corrected in two patients by reprogramming to the bipolar pacing mode. High thresholds and loss of capture were corrected in two patients by reprogramming to the unipolar pacing mode. The remaining configurational changes were made for improved sensing or pacing thresholds. This study documents, in a large group of patients, the equivalence of long-term unipolar and bipolar pacing and sensing thresholds and, in addition, demonstrates that lead configuration programmability offered some advantage in a subgroup of patients and may have prevented reoperation in five patients.




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home