JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:963-972
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guiteras, P
Right arrow Articles by Olley, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Guiteras, P
Right arrow Articles by Olley, P

Count-based scintigraphic method to calculate ventricular volumes in children: in vitro and clinical validation

P Guiteras, M Green, M DeSouza, D Gilday, and P Olley

A "phantom" was used to validate 1) estimates of different depths of a constant radioactivity source, and 2) the calculation of different volumes using a constant depth and different attenuation coefficients. Using data from this in vitro study, scintigraphic estimates of right ventricular volume and ejection fraction were compared with those obtained by cineangiography in 36 children with either a normal right ventricle or various right ventricular diseases. The static program accurately estimates the distance from the radiation source to the collimator surface (r = 0.99). Radionuclide count methods best predict "phantom" volumes using attenuation coefficients between 0.11(-1) and 0.13(-1) cm. A coefficient of 0.10(-1) underestimates, whereas 0.15(-1) cm grossly overestimates actual volumes. In vivo data were therefore analyzed using an attenuation coefficient of 0.11(-1) with right ventricular counts corrected using either right ventricular or left ventricular background. Closest agreement between scintigraphic and cineangiographic volumes was obtained using right ventricular background, although end-diastolic volumes larger than 100 ml were substantially underestimated. On the basis of this study, the use of two different attenuation coefficients is suggested: the smaller 0.11(-1) cm to calculate end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and the larger 0.15(-1) cm for volumes greater than 100 ml.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.