Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:898-903
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svinarich, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svinarich, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, R.

Electrophysiologic demonstration of concealed conduction in anomalous atrioventricular bypass tracts

JT Svinarich, DY Tai, J Mickelson, EC Keung, and RJ Sung

To demonstrate the occurrence of concealed conduction in anomalous atrioventricular (AV) bypass tracts, 11 patients were selected for study. Two had a right-sided and nine had a left-sided bypass tract. Electrode catheters were placed in the right atrium, coronary sinus, AV junction and right ventricle. After every eighth atrial or ventricular driving beat (A1 or V1) at a constant cycle length, two successive atrial or ventricular premature beats (A2 and A3 or V2 and V3) were delivered. The A1A2 or V1V2 interval was fixed at 30 ms greater than the effective refractory period of the atrium or right ventricle, but less than the effective refractory period of the bypass tract in the anterograde or retrograde direction. This allows A2 or V2 to capture the atrium or ventricle, but not conduct in the bypass tract. The A3 or V3 was delivered from late diastole with a progressively shorter A2A3 or V2V3 interval until atrial or ventricular refractoriness was encountered. In the anterograde direction, the presence of A2 prevented A3 conduction in the bypass tract despite A1A3 intervals being longer than the anterograde effective refractory period of the bypass tract in 8 of the 11 patients. In the retrograde direction, the presence of V2 prevented V3 conduction in the bypass tract despite V1V3 intervals being longer than the retrograde effective refractory period of the bypass tract in 3 of the 11 patients. Thus, using the technique of programmed electrical stimulation, concealed conduction in anomalous AV bypass tracts can be demonstrated in both anterograde and retrograde directions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Y. Miyauchi, Y. Kobayashi, T. Ino, and H. Atarashi
Local slow potential preceding the surface QRS complex detected at the subvalvular mitral annulus in patients with a left-sided concealed accessory pathway. Incidence, electrophysiological characteristics and the possible mechanism, with demonstration of anterograde concealed conduction through the pathway
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1818 - 1825.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Yoshida, H. Ikeda, T. Hiraki, I. Kubara, M. Ohga, and T. Imaizumi
Detection of concealed left sided accessory atrioventricular pathway by P wave signal averaged electrocardiogram
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement