JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:632-639
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, R.

Fascicular conduction disturbances and ischemic heart disease: adverse prognosis despite coronary revascularization

TM Bateman, MH Weiss, LS Czer, CM Conklin, RM Kass, ME Stewart, JM Matloff, and RJ Gray

In patients with ischemic heart disease, fascicular conduction disturbances are associated with increased mortality. This study reveals that increased mortality also exists for certain types of fascicular conduction disturbances after myocardial revascularization. In 227 consecutive patients undergoing bypass surgery, 24 had preoperative and an additional 52 developed at surgery a fascicular conduction disturbance. At 66 +/- 14 months of follow-up, 6 (4%) of 148 control patients without pre- or postoperative fascicular conduction disturbances had died from cardiac causes. Although right bundle branch block and left hemifascicular block were the most common form of fascicular conduction disturbance, only 1 of 55 of these patients died (p = NS). Mortality rates were much higher for patients with left bundle branch block or an intraventricular conduction defect; 8 (38%) of 21 died from cardiac causes (p less than 0.05). A high risk subgroup was identified by comparing 14 consecutive patients with left bundle branch block or an intraventricular conduction defect who survived more than 1 year postoperatively with 21 consecutive patients with these same conduction defects who died within 1 year of surgery. The following variables were significantly (p less than 0.05) different (survivors versus nonsurvivors): age (58 +/- 7 versus 65 +/- 9 years); class IV angina (2 of 14 versus 16 of 21), prior myocardial infarction (9 of 14 versus 21 of 21), left ventricular ejection fraction (53 +/- 18 versus 41 +/- 15%), three vessel disease (9 of 14 versus 20 of 21) and left ventricular aneurysm (2 of 14 versus 13 of 21).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. J. Cook, J. M. Bailon, T. T. Douglas, K. D. Henke, J. R. Westberg, M. E. Shirk-Marienau, and T. M. Sundt
Changing Incidence, Type, and Natural History of Conduction Defects After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1732 - 1737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. W. Lewis Jr., C. R. Webb, S. D. Pickard, J. Lehman, and G. Jacobsen
The increased need for a permanent pacemaker after reoperative cardiac surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1998; 116(1): 74 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.