JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:318-325
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pepine, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pepine, C.

Effect of nifedipine on coronary hemodynamics in patients with left anterior descending coronary occlusion

RL Feldman, JA Hill, CR Conti, and CJ Pepine

The mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effects of calcium channel antagonists in patients with effort angina were investigated by studying the coronary hemodynamic responses of the anterior left ventricular region before and after administration of nifedipine in 13 patients whose left anterior descending coronary artery was filled by flow from collateral vessels. Nifedipine was given bucally in a dose (10 or 20 mg) that decreased aortic pressure 5 mm Hg or more. Nifedipine increased collateral flow (regional thermodilution) in only three patients (p = NS), but consistently decreased coronary resistance in the left ventricular anterior region (p less than 0.05). Anterior region myocardial oxygen consumption did not change after nifedipine administration. Lactate metabolism was evaluated in eight patients: values were abnormal in four patients before nifedipine; after nifedipine, values remained abnormal in three of these patients and became abnormal in one other. During atrial pacing stress, angina occurred in all patients before nifedipine and at the same or lower heart rate in nine patients after nifedipine. After nifedipine administered at the same rate that induced angina during the control period, collateral flow and myocardial oxygen consumption were usually lower (both p less than 0.05), but anterior region coronary resistance was unchanged compared with control values. Lactate metabolism was not usually improved. Thus, although nifedipine maintained collateral flow while aortic pressure decreased, no consistent beneficial effect on pacing-induced angina was seen.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.