cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:273-279
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slutsky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Slutsky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, M

Computed tomographic analysis of the effects of hyperosmolar mannitol and methylprednisolone on myocardial infarct size

RA Slutsky and M Murray

Using contrast-enhanced computed tomography, the effects of hyperosmolar mannitol and methylprednisolone on experimentally produced myocardial infarcts were evaluated serially over the course of approximately 1 month. Infarct size, initial perfusion defect (jeopardized segment) and noninfarcted muscle mass were determined in three groups of conditioned mongrel dogs. Group 1 (n = 11) served as the control group, groups 2 and 3 were pretreated with mannitol (375 mg/kg, n = 10) or methylprednisolone (7.5 mg/kg, n = 11). Each animal in the treatment groups was treated with identical doses of the originally administered agent twice daily for 7 days after coronary occlusion. Each group developed increases in the noninfarcted muscle mass of the left ventricle (compensatory hypertrophy). The mean increase averaged more than 20% over 30 days when all groups were included together. Infarct size was smaller in both of the treatment groups. However, at 4 days after infarction, mannitol-treated dogs had a mean infarct size that was 68 +/- 8% (+/- standard error of the mean) of the size of control infarcts (p less than 0.01) and methylprednisolone-treated dogs had a mean infarct size that was 77 +/- 6% of the size of control infarcts (p less than 0.01) (referenced to the initial perfusion defect). At 30 days, these differences were less substantial (though still significant), 88 +/- 4% and 85 +/- 5%, respectively. Pharmacologic interventions can be shown to alter the size of an acute myocardial infarction, particularly when examined over the time course of infarct healing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home