Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 5:21-28
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, S

Right ventricular function at rest and during exercise in aortic and mitral valve disease

DA Morrison, L Lancaster, R Henry, and S Goldman

Right ventricular function at rest and during exercise was examined in a group of patients with symptomatic aortic or mitral valve disease, or both. The right ventricular ejection fraction was less than 45% in 22 of 36 patients at rest and in 12 of 17 subjects at symptom-limited, supine bicycle exercise. The right ventricular ejection fraction failed to increase more than 5% with exercise in 17 of 17 patients. The central venous pressure was greater than 5 mm Hg in 18 of 36 patients at rest and in 13 of 17 patients at maximal exercise. There was a significant inverse relation between rest right ventricular ejection fraction and mean pulmonary artery pressure (r = -0.47, p less than 0.05) and between rest right ventricular ejection fraction and mean central venous pressure (r = -0.39, p less than 0.05). There was no significant relation between the exercise values of these variables. In individual patients, the changes in right ventricular ejection fraction and pulmonary artery pressure with graded exercise were nonlinear. It is concluded that right ventricular function is not a simple function of pulmonary artery pressure at rest or during exercise in aortic and mitral valve disease. Less than one-quarter of the variation in right ventricular ejection fraction at rest can be explained by the variation in pulmonary artery pressure, and the finding of a normal (greater than 45%) right ventricular ejection fraction does not reliably exclude the possibility of pulmonary hypertension in a patient with valvular heart disease.




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement