Comparison of clinical variables and variables derived from a limited predischarge exercise test as predictors of early and late mortality after myocardial infarction

An exercise test limited to 5 METS or 70% of age-predicted maximal heart rate was performed 1 day before hospital discharge by 225 survivors of acute myocardial infarction, all of whom were subsequently followed up for at least 5 years. The mortality rate was 11.1% during the first year, but averaged only 2.9% per year from the second to fifth year. Over the entire follow-up period, the five variables that predicted mortality by multivariate analysis were QRS score, an exercise-induced ST segment shift, previous infarction, failure to achieve target heart rate or work load and ventricular arrhythmia during the exercise test. Because mortality differed markedly before and after 1 year, Cox regression analyses were performed separately for both of these periods. The factors that were predictive of mortality during the first year were an exercise-induced ST shift (p less than 0.0001, relative risk 7.8), failure to increase systolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg or more during exercise (p = 0.0039, relative risk 4.3) and angina in hospital 48 hours or longer after admission (p = 0.0046, relative risk 3.4). None of these three variables was predictive of mortality after 1 year. Previous infarction (p = 0.0007), QRS score (p = 0.0042) and ventricular arrhythmia during the exercise test (p = 0.016) were predictive of mortality after the first year. Thus, clinical and exercise test variables are complementary predictors of mortality after myocardial infarction. An abnormal ST segment response during an early limited exercise test and angina in the hospital are common strong predictors of mortality to 1 year, but not thereafter. Late mortality correlates with markers of poor left ventricular function.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kavanagh, D. J. Mertens, L. F. Hamm, J. Beyene, J. Kennedy, P. Corey, and R. J. Shephard Prediction of Long-Term Prognosis in 12 169 Men Referred for Cardiac Rehabilitation Circulation, August 6, 2002; 106(6): 666 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Tavel Stress Testing in Cardiac Evaluation : Current Concepts With Emphasis on the ECG Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 907 - 925. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Previtali, R. Fetiveau, L. Lanzarini, C. Cavalotti, and C. Klersy Prognostic value of myocardial viability and ischemia detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 380 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Spertus, N. S. Weiss, N. R. Every, W. D. Weaver, and Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Proj The Influence of Clinical Risk Factors on the Use of Angiography and Revascularization After Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, November 27, 1995; 155(21): 2309 - 2316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. Deedwania and E. V. Carbajal Silent Myocardial Ischemia: A Clinical Perspective Arch Intern Med, December 1, 1991; 151(12): 2373 - 2382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. DeBusk Specialized Testing after Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction Ann Intern Med, March 15, 1989; 110(6): 470 - 481. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Cheitlin Finding the High-Risk Patient With Coronary Artery Disease JAMA, April 15, 1988; 259(15): 2271 - 2277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Gore, R. J. Goldberg, J. S. Alpert, and J. E. Dalen The Increased Use of Diagnostic Procedures in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Community-Wide Perspective Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1987; 147(10): 1729 - 1732. [Abstract] [PDF]