JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:2204-2210, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.045 (Published online 16 May 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2007.02.045v1
49/22/2204    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cademartiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cademartiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Usefulness of 64-Slice Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Assess In-Stent Restenosis

Filippo Cademartiri, MD, PhD*,{dagger},1, Joanne D. Schuijf, MSc{ddagger},§,1, Francesca Pugliese, MD*, Nico R. Mollet, MD, PhD*,{dagger}, J. Wouter Jukema, MD, PhD{ddagger},§, Erica Maffei, MD{dagger}, Lucia J. Kroft, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Alessandro Palumbo, MD{dagger}, Diego Ardissino, MD{dagger}, Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD*, Gabriel P. Krestin, MD, PhD*, Ernst E. Van der Wall, MD, PhD{ddagger},§, Pim J. de Feyter, MD, PhD* and Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD{ddagger},*

* Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
{ddagger} Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
§ Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Manuscript received September 19, 2006; revised manuscript received January 22, 2007, accepted February 5, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jeroen J. Bax, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. (Email: jbax{at}knoware.nl).

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography in the follow-up of patients with previous coronary stent implantation.

Background: Recent investigations have shown increased image quality and diagnostic accuracy for noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-slice MSCT as compared with previous-generation MSCT scanners, but data on the evaluation of coronary stents are scarce.

Methods: In 182 patients (152 [84%] male, ages 58 ± 11 years) with previous stent (≥2.5 mm diameter) implantation (n = 192), 64-slice MSCT angiography using either a Sensation 64 (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) or Aquilion 64 (Toshiba, Otawara, Japan) was performed. At each center, coronary stents were evaluated by 2 experienced observers and evaluated for the presence of significant (≥50%) in-stent restenosis. Quantitative coronary angiography served as the standard of reference.

Results: A total of 14 (7.3%) stented segments were excluded because of poor image quality. In the interpretable stents, 20 of the 178 (11.2%) evaluated stents were significantly diseased, of which 19 were correctly detected by 64-slice MSCT. Accordingly, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value to identify in-stent restenosis in interpretable stents were 95.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85% to 100%), 93.0% (95% CI 90% to 97%), 63.3% (95% CI 46% to 81%), and 99.3% (95% CI 98% to 100%), respectively.

Conclusions: In-stent restenosis can be evaluated with 64-slice MSCT with good diagnostic accuracy. In particular, a high negative predictive value of 99% was observed, indicating that 64-slice MSCT may be most valuable as a noninvasive method of excluding in-stent restenosis.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CI = confidence interval
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  MSCT = multislice computed tomography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Oncel, G. Oncel, A. Tastan, and B. Tamci
Evaluation of Coronary Stent Patency and In-Stent Restenosis with Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography Without Heart Rate Control
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 56 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F Pugliese, A C Weustink, C Van Mieghem, F Alberghina, M Otsuka, W B Meijboom, N van Pelt, N R Mollet, F Cademartiri, G P Krestin, et al.
Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis
Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 848 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
W T Roberts, J J Bax, and L C Davies
Cardiac CT and CT coronary angiography: technology and application
Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 781 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al.
Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 531 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, P. Clopton, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, et al.
Highlights of the year in JACC 2007.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 490 - 512.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.