HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: j.jacc.2006.10.080v1 49/19/1965    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, J. P. Articles by Narayan, S. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brown, J. P. Articles by Narayan, S. M.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDER

Using Electrocardiographic Activation Time and Diastolic Intervals to Separate Focal From Macro–Re-Entrant Atrial Tachycardias

University of California and Veterans Administration Medical Centers, San Diego, California.

Manuscript received March 8, 2006; revised manuscript received October 12, 2006, accepted October 17, 2006.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sanjiv M. Narayan, Veterans Affairs and University of California Medical Centers-San Diego, Cardiology/111A, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, California 92161. (Email: snarayan{at}ucsd.edu).

Objectives: This study was designed to separate focal from atypical macro–re-entrant atrial tachycardia (AT) on the electrocardiogram (ECG).

Background: Focal AT often cannot be distinguished from macro–re-entrant AT until the time of electrophysiology study (EPS). We hypothesized that quantitative ECG metrics should separate focal AT, using its short activation relative to tachycardia cycle length (CL), from macro–re-entrant AT, whose activation should span the CL. We developed tools to accurately quantify CL and P- or F-wave duration even when overlying T waves, then prospectively applied them to patients during focal or macro–re-entrant AT ablation and compared them to the gold standard EPS diagnosis.

Methods: We studied 41 patients (27 men, 14 women) age 57 ± 17 years. In the training group (n = 20), tachycardia P or F waves overlying T waves were identified from transitions in slope (dV/dt) relative to "expected" T waves generated from scaling of the sinus-rate T-wave. Electrocardiographic P-wave duration agreed with the duration of intra-atrial activation. Autocorrelation was used to estimate ECG atrial CL (p < 0.001).

Results: Compared to macro–re-entry (n = 13), focal AT (n = 7) had shorter P waves (115 ± 31 ms vs. 227 ± 67 ms; p < 0.001) that were smaller ratios of CL (28 ± 7% vs. 85 ± 21%; p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve areas for AT were 0.92 for P(F)-wave duration and 0.99 for P(F)/CL ratio. On blinded prospective analysis (n = 21), P(F)-wave duration <160 ms identified focal (n = 7) from macro–re-entrant AT (n = 14) with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity, and a P(F)/CL ratio <45% gave 86% sensitivity and 98% specificity.

Conclusions: Quantitative ECG indexes of shorter atrial activation and longer diastolic interval separate focal from macro–re-entrant AT without diagnostic maneuvers.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   AF = atrial fibrillation   AT = atrial tachycardia   CI = confidence interval   CL = cycle length   ECG = electrocardiogram   EPS = electrophysiologic study

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Narayan and M. R. Franz Quantifying fractionation and rate in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials: implications for substrate mapping Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(suppl_6): vi89 - vi95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]