JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:1651-1659, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.059
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bjork Ingul, C.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bjork Ingul, C.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Automated Analysis of Myocardial Deformation at Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

An Angiographic Validation

Charlotte Bjork Ingul, MD*,{dagger}, Asbjorn Stoylen, MD, PhD*,1, Stig A. Slordahl, MD, PhD*, Rune Wiseth, MD, PhD*, Malcolm Burgess, MD{dagger} and Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD{dagger},*

* Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
{dagger} University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Manuscript received May 12, 2006; revised manuscript received December 12, 2006, accepted January 1, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Thomas H. Marwick, University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia. (Email: tmarwick{at}uq.edu.au).

Objectives: We investigated the accuracy of automated analysis of myocardial deformation during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

Background: The time required for segmental measurement of strain rate imaging (SRI) limits its feasibility for quantification of DSE.

Methods: Myocardial deformation was assessed at DSE in 197 patients, 76 with and 61 without coronary artery disease (CAD) at angiography, and 60 at low risk of CAD. Automated deformation analysis was based on velocity gradient and segment length methods of measuring longitudinal motion within a region of interest tracked through the cardiac cycle. Results were compared with independent wall motion scoring (WMS). Patients were randomly divided; group A (n = 69) established optimal cutoffs for the parameters and group B (n = 68) tested their accuracy.

Results: The feasibility of WMS exceeded that of both SRI methods at rest and at peak stress. In group A, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of the peak systolic strain rate was 0.90 by both methods, and the optimal cutoffs for detection of CAD were –1.3 (velocity gradient) and –1.2 s–1 (segment length). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves for end-systolic strain were less (0.87) by both methods, with respective cutoffs of 9% and 8%. In group B, the velocity and segment length methods had respective sensitivities of 87% and 84% for SR, and 87% and 88% for end-systolic strain. Both significantly exceeded that of WMS in the same group (75%).

Conclusions: Automated analysis of myocardial deformation at DSE is feasible and accurate, and may increase the sensitivity of expert conventional reading.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AUC = area under the curve
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CX = circumflex artery
  DSE = dobutamine stress echocardiography
  LAD = left anterior descending artery
  PSI = post-systolic strain index
  ROC = receiver-operating characteristic
  S = strain
  Ses = end-systolic strain
  Sps = peak post-systolic strain
  SR = strain rate
  SRs = peak systolic strain rate
  SRI = strain rate imaging
  tSRs = time to peak systolic strain rate
  WMS = wall motion score
  WMSI = wall motion score index




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
B. H. Amundsen, J. Crosby, P. A. Steen, H. Torp, S. A. Slordahl, and A. Stoylen
Regional myocardial long-axis strain and strain rate measured by different tissue Doppler and speckle tracking echocardiography methods: a comparison with tagged magnetic resonance imaging
Eur J Echocardiogr, July 23, 2008; (2008) jen201v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi
Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)
Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Reant, L. Labrousse, S. Lafitte, P. Bordachar, X. Pillois, L. Tariosse, S. Bonoron-Adele, P. Padois, C. Deville, R. Roudaut, et al.
Experimental Validation of Circumferential, Longitudinal, and Radial 2-Dimensional Strain During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Conditions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. H. Marwick
Straining to detect ischaemia
Eur. Heart J., June 6, 2007; (2007) ehm166v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.