|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1652-1657, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.059
(Published online 25 September 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |



* Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Interventional Cardiology, Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest Cedex, France
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario Valencia, Valencia, Spain
|| Department of Cardiology, Ospedali del Tigullio, Lavanga, Italy
¶ Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Vall dHebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuscript received April 20, 2006; revised manuscript received June 6, 2006, accepted June 19, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Nynke van Dijk, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. (Email: n.vandijk{at}amc.uva.nl).
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of physical counterpressure maneuvers (PCM) in daily life.
BACKGROUND: There is presently no evidence-based therapy for vasovagal syncope. Current treatment consists of explanation and life-style advice. Physical counterpressure maneuvers have been shown to raise blood pressure and to control or abort vasovagal episodes in laboratory conditions.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial, which included 223 patients age 38.6 (±15.4) years with recurrent vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms. One hundred and seventeen patients were randomized to standardized conventional therapy alone, and 106 patients received conventional therapy plus training in PCM.
RESULTS: The median yearly syncope burden during follow-up was significantly lower in the group trained in PCM than in the control group (p = 0.004). During a mean follow-up period of 14 months, overall 50.9% of the patients with conventional treatment and 31.6% of the patients trained in PCM experienced a syncopal recurrence (p = 0.005). Actuarial recurrence-free survival was better in the treatment group (log-rank p = 0.018), resulting in a relative risk reduction of 39% (95% confidence interval, 11% to 53%). No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Physical counterpressure maneuvers are a risk-free, effective, and low-cost treatment method in patients with vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms, and should be advised as first-line treatment in patients presenting with vasovagal syncope with prodromal symptoms. (The PC-Trial; http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/45146526/0/45146526.html; ISRCTN45146526 [controlled-trials.com] )
| |||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. P. Tan and S. W. Parry Vasovagal syncope in the older patient. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 12, 2008; 51(6): 599 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brignole, F. Giada, A. Raviele, and J. J. Blanc Pacing for syncope: what role? which perspective? Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I37 - I43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T Evans Physical counterpressure manoeuvres reduced vasovagal syncope Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 44 - 44. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Steering Committee of the ISSUE 3 Study International study on syncope of uncertain aetiology 3 (ISSUE 3): pacemaker therapy for patients with asystolic neurally-mediated syncope: rationale and study design Europace, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |