|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1378-1384, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.069
(Published online 12 September 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiovascular Division, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Manuscript received April 11, 2006; revised manuscript received May 18, 2006, accepted May 23, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Masafumi Kitakaze, Cardiovascular Division, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita City, Osaka Pref. 565-8565, Japan. (Email: kitakaze{at}zf6.so-net.ne.jp).
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to determine whether the blockade of histamine H2 receptors is beneficial for the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure (CHF).
BACKGROUND: Because CHF is one of the major life-threatening diseases, we need to find a novel effective therapy. Intriguingly, our previous study, which predicts the involvement of histamine in CHF, suggests that we should test this hypothesis in patients with CHF.
METHODS: We selected 159 patients who received famotidine among symptomatic CHF patients for the retrospective study. We blindly selected age- and gender-matched CHF patients receiving drugs for gastritis other than histamine H2 receptor blockers as a control group. For the prospective study, 50 symptomatic CHF patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. One group received famotidine of 30 mg/day for 6 months, and the other group received teprenone.
RESULTS: In the retrospective study, famotidine of 20 to 40 mg decreased both left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic lengths (LVDd and LVDs, respectively) and the plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (182 ± 21 vs. 259 ± 25 pg/ml, p < 0.05) with unaltered fractional shortening (FS). In a randomized, open-label study, compared with teprenone, famotidine of 30 mg prospectively decreased both New York Heart Association functional class (p < 0.05) and plasma BNP levels (183 ± 26 pg/ml vs. 285 ± 41 pg/ml, p < 0.05); this corresponded to decreasing both LVDd (57 ± 2 mm vs. 64 ± 2 mm, p < 0.05) and LVDs (47 ± 2 mm vs. 55 ± 2 mm, p < 0.05) with unaltered FS (15 ± 1% vs. 17 ± 1%). The frequency of readmission because of worsening of CHF was lower in the famotidine group (4% and 24%, p < 0.05). On the other hand, teprenone had no effects on CHF.
CONCLUSIONS: Famotidine improved both cardiac symptoms and ventricular remodeling associated with CHF. Histamine H2 receptor blockers may have therapeutic benefits for CHF.
| |||||||||||
Related Article
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006 48: 1385-1386.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. W. Kolck, K. Alfter, J. Homann, I. von Kugelgen, and G. J. Molderings Cardiac Mast Cells: Implications for Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1107 - 1107. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kim and M. Kitakaze Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1107 - 1108. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.H. W. Tang and G. S. Francis The Year in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 19, 2006; 48(12): 2575 - 2583. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Francis and W.H. W. Tang Histamine, Mast Cells, and Heart Failure: Is There a Connection? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1385 - 1386. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |