FOCUS ISSUE: CARDIAC INTERVENTION: INTERVENTION IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Prerandomization Antithrombin Therapy on Outcomes in the SYNERGY Trial
Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in NonST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Marc Cohen, MD, FACC*,*,
Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC ,
Karen Pieper, MS ,
Charles V. Pollack, Jr, MD ,
Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC ,
James Hoekstra, MD||,
Shaun G. Goodman, MD, FACC¶,
Anatoly Langer, MD, FACC¶,
Jacques J. Col, MD#,
Harvey D. White, MD**,
Robert M. Califf, MD, FACC ,
James J. Ferguson, MD, FACC on behalf of the SYNERGY Trial Investigators
* HEART Hospital of New Jersey, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
|| Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
¶ Canadian Heart Research Centre and Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
# Clinique Universitaire St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium
** Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
 Texas Heart Institute, St. Lukes-Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Manuscript received September 1, 2005;
revised manuscript received May 5, 2006,
accepted May 16, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Marc Cohen, Cardiac Cath Lab Administration, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, 201 Lyons Avenue, Newark, New Jersey 07112. (Email: marcohen{at}SBHCS.com).
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of receiving pretreatment with antithrombin before randomization as well as overall efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the SYNERGY (Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors) trial.
BACKGROUND: The SYNERGY trial results demonstrated noninferiority in outcomes with enoxaparin compared with UFH. Randomized treatment was independent of prerandomization treatment.
METHODS: Analyses were first performed on the 4 prerandomization subgroups: patients who received no antithrombin therapy and those who were treated with enoxaparin or UFH or both. Then, we focused on the subgroup of patients who received no pretreatment or were pretreated with and randomized to the same drug. Of the 9,978 patients, 2,440 did not receive prerandomization therapy and 6,138 received consistent therapy through randomization. The primary end point was the composite of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days.
RESULTS: After adjustment for differences among the subgroups, no significant difference in the association between the 4 pretreatment groups and death or MI remained (p = 0.171). The randomized treatment effect on 30-day death or MI tended to vary with pretreatment (p = 0.055 for interaction test after adjustment). Patients who received consistent therapy with enoxaparin had significantly less death or MI than patients randomized to UFH (adjusted p = 0.041) with a trend toward increased bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with antithrombin therapy before randomization had potential impact on comparison of study drug effects. After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between subgroups, consistent therapy with enoxaparin might be superior to UFH in reducing death or nonfatal MI, with a modest excess in bleeding.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time | | CABG = coronary artery bypass graft | | GP = glycoprotein | | GUSTO = Global Utilization of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries trial | | MI = myocardial infarction | | NSTE ACS = nonST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | SYNERGY = Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors trial | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction | | UFH = unfractionated heparin |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Astroulakis and J. M. Hill
Does 'SWITCHing' from heparin to bivalirudin monotherapy result in a bleeding benefit?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
June 1, 2009;
11(suppl_C):
C13 - C18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Giugliano, J. A. White, C. Bode, P. W. Armstrong, G. Montalescot, B. S. Lewis, A. van `t Hof, L. G. Berdan, K. L. Lee, J. T. Strony, et al.
Early versus Delayed, Provisional Eptifibatide in Acute Coronary Syndromes
N. Engl. J. Med.,
May 21, 2009;
360(21):
2176 - 2190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. B Maxwell, D. A Holdford, M. A Crouch, and D. A Patel
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anticoagulation Strategies in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Ann. Pharmacother.,
April 1, 2009;
43(4):
586 - 595.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. White, D. P. Chew, J. W. Hoekstra, C. D. Miller, C. V. Pollack Jr, F. Feit, A. M. Lincoff, M. Bertrand, S. Pocock, J. Ware, et al.
Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Either Unfractionated Heparin or Enoxaparin to Bivalirudin in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Managed With an Invasive Strategy: Results From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 6, 2008;
51(18):
1734 - 1741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Giugliano and E. Braunwald
The Year in Non ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 2, 2007;
50(14):
1386 - 1395.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Gibson, S. A. Murphy, G. Montalescot, D. A. Morrow, D. Ardissino, M. Cohen, D. C. Gulba, O. H. Kracoff, B. S. Lewis, N. Roguin, et al.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Receiving Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin After Fibrinolytic Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 12, 2007;
49(23):
2238 - 2246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Mahaffey and R. A. Harrington
Optimal Timing for Use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Questions, Answers, and More Questions
JAMA,
February 14, 2007;
297(6):
636 - 639.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Collet, R. Dumaine, and G. Montalescot
Antithrombin treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
February 1, 2007;
9(suppl_A):
A11 - A24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|