Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1346-1354, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.058 (Published online 11 September 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.05.058v1
48/7/1346    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M.

FOCUS ISSUE: CARDIAC INTERVENTION: INTERVENTION IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Prerandomization Antithrombin Therapy on Outcomes in the SYNERGY Trial

Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Marc Cohen, MD, FACC*,*, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC{dagger}, Karen Pieper, MS{dagger}, Charles V. Pollack, Jr, MD{ddagger}, Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC§, James Hoekstra, MD||, Shaun G. Goodman, MD, FACC, Anatoly Langer, MD, FACC, Jacques J. Col, MD#, Harvey D. White, MD**, Robert M. Califf, MD, FACC{dagger}, James J. Ferguson, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger} on behalf of the SYNERGY Trial Investigators

* HEART Hospital of New Jersey, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey
{dagger} Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
|| Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
{ddagger} Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
§ Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Canadian Heart Research Centre and Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
# Clinique Universitaire St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium
** Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
{dagger}{dagger} Texas Heart Institute, St. Luke’s-Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas.

Manuscript received September 1, 2005; revised manuscript received May 5, 2006, accepted May 16, 2006.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Marc Cohen, Cardiac Cath Lab Administration, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, 201 Lyons Avenue, Newark, New Jersey 07112. (Email: marcohen{at}SBHCS.com).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of receiving pretreatment with antithrombin before randomization as well as overall efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the SYNERGY (Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors) trial.

BACKGROUND: The SYNERGY trial results demonstrated noninferiority in outcomes with enoxaparin compared with UFH. Randomized treatment was independent of prerandomization treatment.

METHODS: Analyses were first performed on the 4 prerandomization subgroups: patients who received no antithrombin therapy and those who were treated with enoxaparin or UFH or both. Then, we focused on the subgroup of patients who received no pretreatment or were pretreated with and randomized to the same drug. Of the 9,978 patients, 2,440 did not receive prerandomization therapy and 6,138 received consistent therapy through randomization. The primary end point was the composite of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days.

RESULTS: After adjustment for differences among the subgroups, no significant difference in the association between the 4 pretreatment groups and death or MI remained (p = 0.171). The randomized treatment effect on 30-day death or MI tended to vary with pretreatment (p = 0.055 for interaction test after adjustment). Patients who received consistent therapy with enoxaparin had significantly less death or MI than patients randomized to UFH (adjusted p = 0.041) with a trend toward increased bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with antithrombin therapy before randomization had potential impact on comparison of study drug effects. After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between subgroups, consistent therapy with enoxaparin might be superior to UFH in reducing death or nonfatal MI, with a modest excess in bleeding.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time
  CABG = coronary artery bypass graft
  GP = glycoprotein
  GUSTO = Global Utilization of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries trial
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NSTE ACS = non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  SYNERGY = Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors trial
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
  UFH = unfractionated heparin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
Z. Astroulakis and J. M. Hill
Does 'SWITCHing' from heparin to bivalirudin monotherapy result in a bleeding benefit?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2009; 11(suppl_C): C13 - C18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. P. Giugliano, J. A. White, C. Bode, P. W. Armstrong, G. Montalescot, B. S. Lewis, A. van `t Hof, L. G. Berdan, K. L. Lee, J. T. Strony, et al.
Early versus Delayed, Provisional Eptifibatide in Acute Coronary Syndromes
N. Engl. J. Med., May 21, 2009; 360(21): 2176 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. B Maxwell, D. A Holdford, M. A Crouch, and D. A Patel
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anticoagulation Strategies in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2009; 43(4): 586 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. D. White, D. P. Chew, J. W. Hoekstra, C. D. Miller, C. V. Pollack Jr, F. Feit, A. M. Lincoff, M. Bertrand, S. Pocock, J. Ware, et al.
Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Either Unfractionated Heparin or Enoxaparin to Bivalirudin in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Managed With an Invasive Strategy: Results From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 6, 2008; 51(18): 1734 - 1741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. P. Giugliano and E. Braunwald
The Year in Non ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1386 - 1395.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Gibson, S. A. Murphy, G. Montalescot, D. A. Morrow, D. Ardissino, M. Cohen, D. C. Gulba, O. H. Kracoff, B. S. Lewis, N. Roguin, et al.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Receiving Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin After Fibrinolytic Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 12, 2007; 49(23): 2238 - 2246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. W. Mahaffey and R. A. Harrington
Optimal Timing for Use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Questions, Answers, and More Questions
JAMA, February 14, 2007; 297(6): 636 - 639.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J.-P. Collet, R. Dumaine, and G. Montalescot
Antithrombin treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., February 1, 2007; 9(suppl_A): A11 - A24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement