Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1312-1318, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.063 (Published online 12 September 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.03.063v1
48/7/1312    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saia, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saia, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchi, A.

FOCUS ISSUE: CARDIAC INTERVENTION: SIROLIMUS-PACLITAXEL COMPARISON

Clinical Outcomes for Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Polymer-Coated Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Daily Practice

Results From a Large Multicenter Registry

Francesco Saia, MD, PhD*,*, Giancarlo Piovaccari, MD{dagger}, Antonio Manari, MD{ddagger}, Andrea Santarelli, MD{dagger}, Alberto Benassi, MD§, Enrico Aurier, MD||, Pietro Sangiorgio, MD, Fabio Tarantino, MD#, Giuseppe Geraci, MD**, Giuseppe Vecchi, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Paolo Guastaroba, MSc{ddagger}{ddagger}, Roberto Grilli, MD{ddagger}{ddagger} and Antonio Marzocchi, MD*

* Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
{dagger} Unità Operativa di Cardiologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini, Italy
{ddagger} Unità Operativa di Cardiologia Interventistica, Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
§ Laboratorio di Emodinamica, Hesperia Hospital, Modena, Italy
|| Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore, Parma, Italy
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
# Laboratorio di Emodinamica, Ospedale Morgagni, Forlì, Italy
** Laboratorio di Emodinamica, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
{dagger}{dagger} Unità Operativa di Cardiologia—Centro Interventistico, Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy
{ddagger}{ddagger} Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale Regione Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.

Manuscript received January 6, 2006; revised manuscript received March 23, 2006, accepted March 28, 2006.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Francesco Saia, Catheterization Laboratory, Institute of Cardiology—University of Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi (Pad 21), Via Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. (Email: francescosaia{at}hotmail.com).

OBJECTIVES: We compared the clinical outcome of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in a real-world scenario.

BACKGROUND: In selected patients, SES has been associated with lower late luminal loss than PES. Whether this emerging biological difference could translate into different clinical efficacy in daily practice is presently unknown.

METHODS: This analysis included 1,676 consecutive patients with de novo coronary lesions treated solely with drug-eluting stents (SES = 992; PES = 684). All patients were enrolled in a dynamic prospective registry comprising 13 hospitals. We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during follow-up.

RESULTS: Overall, 29% of the patients had diabetes, 23% had prior MI, and 9% had poor left ventricular function. ST-segment elevation MI was diagnosed at admission in 12%. Multivessel intervention was performed in 16%. At 1-year follow-up, SES was associated with a reduced incidence of MACE (9.2% SES vs. 14.1% PES; p = 0.007) and TVR (5.0% SES vs. 10.0% PES; p = 0.0008) compared to PES. A propensity analysis with many clinical and angiographic variables was carried out to adjust for baseline differences. In this analysis, SES was associated with a 44% risk reduction of MACE (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.78) and a 55% reduction of TVR (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.70). This result was consistent across most subgroups tested. Similar rates of death and MI were observed in the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world population, SES improved 1-year clinical results as compared to PES.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MI = (acute) myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent
  REAL = REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell’Emilia-Romagna
  SES = sirolimus-eluting stent
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Garg, D. J. Cohen, T. Gaziano, and L. Mauri
Balancing the Risks of Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis in Bare-Metal Versus Drug-Eluting Stents: Results of a Decision Analytic Model
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 13, 2008; 51(19): 1844 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. E. Kip, K. Hollabaugh, O. C. Marroquin, and D. O. Williams
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 701 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Kirtane, S. G. Ellis, K. D. Dawkins, A. Colombo, E. Grube, J. J. Popma, M. Fahy, M. B. Leon, J. W. Moses, R. Mehran, et al.
Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Pooled Analysis From 5 Randomized Trials.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 708 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Tomai, B. Reimers, L. De Luca, A. R. Galassi, A. Gaspardone, A. S. Ghini, V. Ferrero, L. Favero, G. Gioffre, F. Prati, et al.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Same Diabetic Patient With Multiple Coronary Artery Lesions: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(1): 15 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N. M M Pires, D. Eefting, M. R de Vries, P. H A Quax, and J W. Jukema
Sirolimus and paclitaxel provoke different vascular pathological responses after local delivery in a murine model for restenosis on underlying atherosclerotic arteries
Heart, August 1, 2007; 93(8): 922 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 270 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. O. Williams, J. D. Abbott, K. E. Kip, and for the DEScover Investigators
Outcomes of 6906 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents: Report of the DEScover Registry
Circulation, November 14, 2006; 114(20): 2154 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Another Front in the Drug-Eluting Stent Battle
Journal Watch Cardiology, November 1, 2006; 2006(1101): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement