JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1268-1276, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.048 (Published online 25 August 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.05.048v1
48/6/1268    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vos, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vos, M. A.

PRECLINICAL STUDY

Beat-to-Beat Variability of Repolarization Determines Proarrhythmic Outcome in Dogs Susceptible to Drug-Induced Torsades de Pointes

Morten B. Thomsen, PhD*,{dagger},2,*, Paul G.A. Volders, MD, PhD{dagger},1, Jet D.M. Beekman*, Jørgen Matz, PhD{ddagger},3 and Marc A. Vos, PhD*

* Department of Medical Physiology, Heart Lung Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Center of Excellence, Cardiovascular Research, H. Lundbeck, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Manuscript received March 29, 2006; revised manuscript received May 4, 2006, accepted May 9, 2006.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Marc A. Vos, Department of Medical Physiology, Yalelaan 50, NL 3584 CM Utrecht, the Netherlands. (Email: m.a.vos{at}umcutrecht.nl).

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether increasing or decreasing beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR) would change drug-induced proarrhythmic outcome accordingly.

BACKGROUND: Increased variability of repolarization has been suggested as a prelude to proarrhythmic circumstances in experimental and clinical situations.

METHODS: The non-cardiovascular, IKr-blocking drug sertindole was administered to anesthetized dogs with chronic atrioventricular block. Three interventions were used to prevent or suppress sertindole-induced torsades de pointes (TdP).

RESULTS: Supratherapeutic doses of sertindole (1.0 mg/kg intravenously) induced TdP in 10 of 13 dogs whereas 0.2 mg/kg induced no TdP, despite increases in QT intervals by both doses. The BVR, quantified as short-term variability (STV) from Poincaré plots, was the only parameter that predicted TdP outcome (1.0 mg/kg sertindole: 2.3 ± 0.7 ms to 5.1 ± 2.1 ms, p < 0.05; 0.2 mg/kg sertindole: 2.3 ± 0.8 ms to 3.2 ± 1.1 ms, p = NS). Interventions: 1) KCl, intravenous, reduced the incidence of sertindole-induced TdP from 6 of 7 to 1 of 7 dogs (p < 0.05) and prevented sertindole-related increase of STV: 3.0 ± 1.1 ms vs. 4.5 ± 1.3 ms (p < 0.05); 2) levcromakalim (IK,ATP activator) reduced sertindole-induced TdP and decreased STV from 4.9 ± 2.1 ms to 2.6 ± 0.9 ms (p < 0.05); 3) steady-state ventricular pacing (60 beats/min) abolished sertindole-induced TdP and decreased STV from 4.9 ± 1.5 to 3.2 ± 1.0 (p < 0.05). Torsades de pointes reappeared upon return to non-paced idioventricular rhythm. None of the 3 interventions reduced the sertindole-induced prolonged QT interval.

CONCLUSIONS: Proarrhythmic intervention is related to an increase in BVR, whereas antiarrhythmic treatment is associated with a decrease in BVR. The BVR is superior to QT interval prolongation in the prediction and prevention of drug-induced TdP in this experimental model.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BVR = beat-to-beat variability of repolarization
  CAVB = chronic atrioventricular block
  CL = cycle length
  IVR = idioventricular rhythm
  LV = left ventricle/ventricular
  MAPD = monophasic action potential duration
  QTc = heart rate–corrected QT intervals
  RV = right ventricle/ventricular
  STV = short-term variability
  TdP = torsades de pointes
  {Delta}MAPD = interventricular dispersion of repolarization duration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Hinterseer, M. B. Thomsen, B.-M. Beckmann, A. Pfeufer, R. Schimpf, H.-E. Wichmann, G. Steinbeck, M. A. Vos, and S. Kaab
Beat-to-beat variability of QT intervals is increased in patients with drug-induced long-QT syndrome: a case control pilot study
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2008; 29(2): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
J. Thireau, B. L. Zhang, D. Poisson, and D. Babuty
Heart rate variability in mice: a theoretical and practical guide
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 93(1): 83 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. K.G. Winckels, M. B. Thomsen, P. Oosterhoff, A. Oros, J. D.M. Beekman, N. J.M. Attevelt, L. Kretzers, and M. A. Vos
High-Septal Pacing Reduces Ventricular Electrical Remodeling and Proarrhythmia in Chronic Atrioventricular Block Dogs
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 906 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.