JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1120-1128, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.062 (Published online 25 August 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2006.03.062v1
48/6/1120    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borden, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borden, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.

STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

William B. Borden, MD and David P. Faxon, MD*

Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Manuscript received March 24, 2006; accepted March 30, 2006.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David P. Faxon, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, 1620 Tremont Street, OBC-3-12P, Boston, Massachusetts 02120. (Email: dfaxon{at}partners.org).

The goal of the initial treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is rapid and effective reperfusion. Randomized trials have demonstrated that primary angioplasty is preferred over thrombolysis if done in a timely manner and by an experienced team. However, due to many factors, performance of primary angioplasty within the goal of 90 min is often not possible. A combined strategy of immediate thrombolysis in the emergency room or in the ambulance followed by angioplasty theoretically could provide early reperfusion with subsequent angioplasty to insure complete reperfusion. Over 17 clinical trials have been reported. Compared with thrombolysis, facilitated angioplasty in the most recent trials has been shown to have a more favorable long-term outcome. Trials comparing facilitated angioplasty with full- or half-dose thrombolysis versus primary angioplasty have been far less favorable with the largest trial to date, the ASSENT (Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)-4 trial, demonstrating a worse outcome in the primary end point of death, congestive heart failure, or shock at 90 days. Pending the results of the FINESSE (Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events) trial, current data suggest that facilitated angioplasty does not offer any advantage over primary angioplasty and may be harmful.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  ECSG = European Cooperative Study Group
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  STEMI = ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
  TNK = tenecteplase
  t-PA = tissue plasminogen activator




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 270 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.