|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:2186-2191, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.084 © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland.
Manuscript received October 20, 2005; revised manuscript received December 14, 2005, accepted December 19, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Paul A. Gurbel, Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Hoffberger Building, Suite 56, 2401 W. Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21215. (Email: pgurbel{at}lifebridgehealth.org).
OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to compare the effects of antiplatelet regimens on early inflammation and cardiac marker release after elective stenting.
BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding the comparative effects of specific antiplatelet regimens on early inflammation marker release after stenting.
METHODS: In a 2 x 2 factorial randomized investigation, patients undergoing stenting were treated with either clopidogrel alone (300 mg or 600 mg; n = 60) or clopidogrel with eptifibatide (n = 60). Platelet aggregation (5 and 20 µM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]), ADP-stimulated expression of active glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, and platelet-bound P-selectin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, C-reactive protein (CRP), and cardiac markers were measured.
RESULTS: Compared with a strategy of clopidogrel alone, clopidogrel + eptifibatide reduced the release of cardiac markers. A marked reduction in platelet aggregation and active GP IIb/IIIa expression (p
0.001) with clopidogrel + eptifibatide was associated with a decrease in CRP and TNF-
release (p
0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of clopidogrel with GP IIb/IIIa blockade resulted in superior inhibition of inflammation and cardiac marker release, which was accompanied by superior platelet inhibition immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with a strategy of clopidogrel alone. The mechanistic and clinical implications of attenuated periprocedural inflammation and myocardial necrosis with a strategy of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition warrant further investigation.
| |||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Kereiakes and P. A. Gurbel Peri-Procedural Platelet Function and Platelet Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Gurbel, R. C. Becker, K. G. Mann, S. R. Steinhubl, and A. D. Michelson Platelet Function Monitoring in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2007; 50(19): 1822 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Angiolillo, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, E. Bernardo, F. Alfonso, C. Macaya, T. A. Bass, and M. A. Costa Variability in Individual Responsiveness to Clopidogrel: Clinical Implications, Management, and Future Perspectives J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1505 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Bliden, J. DiChiara, U. S. Tantry, A. K. Bassi, S. K. Chaganti, and P. A. Gurbel Increased Risk in Patients With High Platelet Aggregation Receiving Chronic Clopidogrel Therapy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is the Current Antiplatelet Therapy Adequate? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 13, 2007; 49(6): 657 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |