|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1929-1934, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.103
(Published online 31 October 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






* Department of Cardiology, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France
Department of Radiology, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France
CNRS UMR 8162, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France
Department of Aeronautical Cardiology, HIA Percy, Clamart, France.
Manuscript received February 27, 2006; revised manuscript received April 11, 2006, accepted April 25, 2006.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Saïd Ghostine, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, 133 avenue de la Resistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France. (Email: ghostine{at}ccml.com).
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography (CT) to identify coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with complete left bundle branch block (LBBB).
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block increases risk of cardiac mortality, and prognosis is primarily determined by the underlying coronary disease. Non-invasive stress tests have limited performance, and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) is usually required.
METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive patients with complete LBBB and sinus rhythm admitted for CCA were enrolled. Computed tomography was performed 3 ± 3.9 days before CCA. The accuracy of 64-slice CT to detect significant stenosis (>50% lumen narrowing) was compared with quantitative coronary angiography. All segments were analyzed regardless of image quality from coronary calcification or motion artifacts. Results were analyzed by patient and by coronary segment (990) using the American Heart Association 15-segment model.
RESULTS: Lower heart rates were associated with improved image quality. Computed tomography correctly identified 35 of 37 (95%) patients without significant stenosis and 28 of 29 (97%) patients with significant stenosis on CCA. Computed tomography correctly assessed 68 of 94 (72%) significant stenosis. Overall, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 64-slice CT for identifying CAD by patient was 95%, 97%, 95%, 93%, and 97%, respectively, and by segment was 97%, 72%, 99%, 91%, and 97%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In a routine clinical practice, 64-slice CT detects with excellent accuracy a significant CAD in patients with complete LBBB. A normal CT in this clinical setting is a robust tool to act as a filter and avoid invasive diagnostic procedures.
| ||||||||||||
Related Article
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006 48: 1935-1937.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Kantor, N. S. Anavekar, and T. C. Gerber Good news on coronary computed tomographic angiography: answers that have questions! Eur. Heart J., July 18, 2008; (2008) ehn338v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ghostine, C. Caussin, M. Habis, Y. Habib, C. Clement, A. Sigal-Cinqualbre, C.-Y. Angel, B. Lancelin, A. Capderou, and J.-F. Paul Non-invasive diagnosis of ischaemic heart failure using 64-slice computed tomography Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2008; (2008) ehn072v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Kramer All High-Risk Patients Should Not Be Screened With Computed Tomographic Angiography Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1333 - 1339. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Achenbach, U. Ropers, A. Kuettner, K. Anders, T. Pflederer, S. Komatsu, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, and D. Ropers Randomized Comparison of 64-Slice Single- and Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 177 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 531 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Abdulla, S. Z. Abildstrom, O. Gotzsche, E. Christensen, L. Kober, and C. Torp-Pedersen 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2007; 28(24): 3042 - 3050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Einstein, K. W. Moser, R. C. Thompson, M. D. Cerqueira, and M. J. Henzlova Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1290 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson The Year in Cardiac Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 988 - 1003. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.C. Lima and J. Hare Visualizing the Coronaries in Patients Presenting With Heart Failure of Unknown Etiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2051 - 2052. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Raff and J. A. Goldstein Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography: Coronary Imaging Evolves J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 8, 2007; 49(18): 1830 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |