|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1796-1802, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.053
(Published online 11 April 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Emory Angiographic Simulation Training (EAST) Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Manuscript received July 30, 2005; revised manuscript received December 15, 2005, accepted December 20, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Christopher U. Cates, Vascular Intervention, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Suite C-430, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 (Email: Christopher_Cates{at}emoryhealthcare.org).
OBJECTIVES: Improvement in performance as measured by metric-based procedural errors must be demonstrated if virtual reality (VR) simulation is to be used as a valid means of proficiency assessment and improvement in procedural-based medical skills.
BACKGROUND: The Food and Drug Administration requires completion of VR simulation training for physicians learning to perform carotid stenting.
METHODS: Interventional cardiologists (n = 20) participating in the Emory NeuroAnatomy Carotid Training program underwent an instructional course on carotid angiography and then performed five serial simulated carotid angiograms on the Vascular Interventional System Trainer (VIST) VR simulator (Mentice AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Of the subjects, 90% completed the full assessment. Procedure time (PT), fluoroscopy time (FT), contrast volume, and composite catheter handling errors (CE) were recorded by the simulator.
RESULTS: An improvement was noted in PT, contrast volume, FT, and CE when comparing the subjects first and last simulations (all p < 0.05). The internal consistency of the VIST VR simulator as assessed with standardized coefficient alpha was high (range 0.81 to 0.93), except for FT (alpha = 0.36). Test-retest reliability was high for CE (r = 0.9, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A learning curve with improved performance was demonstrated on the VIST simulator. This study represents the largest collection of such data to date in carotid VR simulation and is the first report to establish the internal consistency of the VIST simulator and its test-retest reliability across several metrics. These metrics are fundamental benchmarks in the validation of any measurement device. Composite catheter handling errors represent measurable dynamic metrics with high test-retest reliability that are required for the high-stakes assessment of procedural skills.
| ||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Dunn and J. G. Murphy Simulation: About Safety, Not Fantasy Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 6 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Wayne, A. Didwania, J. Feinglass, M. J. Fudala, J. H. Barsuk, and W. C. McGaghie Simulation-Based Education Improves Quality of Care During Cardiac Arrest Team Responses at an Academic Teaching Hospital: A Case-Control Study Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Bates, C. J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, W. A. Gray, K. Ouriel, E. D. Peterson, K. Rosenfield, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2007; 12(1): 35 - 83. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. U. Cates, A. D. Patel, and W. J. Nicholson Use of Virtual Reality Simulation for Mission Rehearsal for Carotid Stenting JAMA, January 17, 2007; 297(3): 265 - 266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic N, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, E. R. Bates, J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey Jr, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2007; 49(1): 126 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |