|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1641-1645, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.065
(Published online 23 March 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |

* Department of Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
Department of Radiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
Manuscript received May 11, 2005; revised manuscript received October 31, 2005, accepted November 16, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Holger Thiele, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Strümpellstr. 39, 14289 Leipzig, Germany. (Email: thielh{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of acute and chronic infarct size (IS) by delayed enhancement (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
BACKGROUND: Infarct size measurements can be used as surrogate end point to reduce the sample size in studies comparing different reperfusion strategies in myocardial infarction (MI). Delayed enhancement MRI is a rather new technique, and so far infarct IS reproducibility has not been established appropriately.
METHODS: In 21 patients (10 acute MI and 11 chronic MI), IS was assessed repeatedly on consecutive days by DE-MRI. Reproducibility, interobserver, and intraobserver variabilities were assessed and compared by the Bland-Altman method.
RESULTS: Acute and chronic IS were 17.1 ± 19.6% (range 5.1% to 69.8%) of LV mass (%LV) and 16.9 ± 9.9 %LV (range 2.0% to 36.0%), respectively. Infarct size difference (bias) between scan I and scan II was 0.5 %LV, and limits of agreement were ±2.4 %LV. Mean bias (0.7 %LV) and limits of agreement (±3.2%) were slightly higher for acute in comparison with chronic MI with 0.4 ± 1.3 %LV. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was low with a mean bias of 0.3 %LV (limits of agreement ± 1.7 %LV) and 0.7 %LV (limits of agreement ± 2.2 %LV), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Infarct size measurement by DE-MRI is an excellent tool for IS assessment, owing to its excellent repeatability in chronic and acute MI. It has therefore the potential to serve as a surrogate end point to uncover advantages of new reperfusion strategies.
| ||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Eitel, F. Behrendt, K. Schindler, D. Kivelitz, M. Gutberlet, G. Schuler, and H. Thiele Differential diagnosis of suspected apical ballooning syndrome using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Eur. Heart J., September 27, 2008; (2008) ehn433v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, K. Schindler, J. Friedenberger, I. Eitel, G. Furnau, E. Grebe, S. Erbs, A. Linke, S. Mobius-Winkler, D. Kivelitz, et al. Intracoronary Compared With Intravenous Bolus Abciximab Application in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Randomized Leipzig Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Abciximab IV Versus IC in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial Circulation, July 1, 2008; 118(1): 49 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S.H. Cheng, J. B. Selvanayagam, M. Jerosch-Herold, W. J. van Gaal, T. D. Karamitsos, S. Neubauer, and A. P. Banning Percutaneous Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Improves Regional Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow and Contractility: Insights From Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 44 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, M. J. Kappl, A. Linke, S. Erbs, E. Boudriot, A. Lembcke, D. Kivelitz, and G. Schuler Influence of time-to-treatment, TIMI-flow grades, and ST-segment resolution on infarct size and infarct transmurality as assessed by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging Eur. Heart J., June 6, 2007; (2007) ehm173v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Christian Positively Magnetic North J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1646 - 1648. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |