|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1584-1587, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.072
(Published online 24 March 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


,b
* National Clinical Research Inc., Richmond, Virginia
Point Medical, Dijon, France
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong
Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, Kentucky
¶ Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey
Manuscript received August 8, 2005; revised manuscript received October 31, 2005, accepted November 30, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. James M. McKenney, National Clinical Research Inc., 2809 Emerywood Parkway, Suite 140, Richmond, Virginia 23294 (Email: jmckenney{at}ncrinc.net).
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of co-administered fenofibrate (FENO) and ezetimibe (EZE) in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.
BACKGROUND: Both EZE and FENO offer complementary benefits to the lipid profile of patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.
METHODS: After completing the 12-week randomized, double-blind base study that compared EZE 10 mg, FENO 160 mg, FENO 160 mg plus EZE 10 mg, and placebo in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, patients continued into a double-blind, 48-week extension phase. Those patients in the FENO plus EZE and FENO groups continued on their respective base study treatment, and patients in the EZE and placebo groups were switched to FENO plus EZE and FENO, respectively.
RESULTS: Of the 587 patients who completed the base study, 576 continued into the extension study (n = 340 in FENO plus EZE and n = 236 in FENO). The FENO plus EZE produced significantly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol compared with FENO (22% vs. 9%, respectively; p < 0.001). There were also significantly greater improvements in triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, nonHDL-C, and apolipoprotein B with FENO plus EZE compared with FENO. Changes in apolipoprotein A-I and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were similar between groups. Overall, FENO plus EZE was well tolerated during the extension study. The proportion of patients with consecutive elevations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase
3 times upper limit of normal were similar between the FENO plus EZE (1.2%) and FENO (1.7%) groups. No cases of creatine phosphokinase elevations
10 times upper limit of normal or myopathy were observed in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, 48-week co-administration of FENO plus EZE was well tolerated and more efficacious than FENO in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.
| |||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Yuan, K. Z. Al-Shali, and R. A. Hegele Hypertriglyceridemia: its etiology, effects and treatment Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 10, 2007; 176(8): 1113 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |