JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1427-1432, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.059 (Published online 14 March 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.11.059v1
47/7/1427    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingkanisorn, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Arai, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ingkanisorn, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Arai, A. E.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Prognosis of Negative Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting to an Emergency Department With Chest Pain

W. Patricia Ingkanisorn, MD*, Raymond Y. Kwong, MD*, Nicole S. Bohme, BA{dagger}, Nancy L. Geller, PhD{dagger}, Kenneth L. Rhoads, MD*, Christopher K. Dyke, MD*, D. Ian Paterson, MD*, Mushabbar A. Syed, MD*, Anthony H. Aletras, PhD* and Andrew E. Arai, MD*,*

* Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, and Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, Maryland
{dagger} Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Manuscript received August 7, 2005; revised manuscript received October 25, 2005, accepted November 21, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Andrew E. Arai, Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room BID416, MSC 1061, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1061. (Email: araia{at}nih.gov).

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the diagnostic value of adenosine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in troponin-negative patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that adenosine CMR could determine which troponin-negative patients with chest pain in an emergency department have coronary artery disease (CAD) or future adverse cardiac events.

METHODS: Adenosine stress CMR was performed on 135 patients who presented to the emergency department with chest pain and had acute myocardial infarction (MI) excluded by troponin-I. The main study outcome was detecting any evidence of significant CAD. Patients were contacted at one year to determine the incidence of significant CAD defined as coronary artery stenosis >50% on angiography, abnormal correlative stress test, new MI, or death.

RESULTS: Adenosine perfusion abnormalities had 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity as the single most accurate component of the CMR examination. Both cardiac risk factors and CMR were significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test, p = 0.0006 and p < 0.0001, respectively). However, an abnormal CMR added significant prognostic value in predicting future diagnosis of CAD, MI, or death over clinical risk factors. In receiver operator curve analysis, adenosine CMR was a more accurate predictor than cardiac risk factors (p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chest pain who had MI excluded by troponin-I and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms, an adenosine CMR examination predicted with high sensitivity and specificity which patients had significant CAD during one-year follow-up. Furthermore, no patients with a normal adenosine CMR study had a subsequent diagnosis of CAD or an adverse outcome.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  MI = myocardial infarction
  TLCMR = total number of cardiac magnetic resonance abnormalities
  TLCRF = total number of cardiac risk factors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. C. Cury, K. Shash, J. T. Nagurney, G. Rosito, M. D. Shapiro, C. H. Nomura, S. Abbara, F. Bamberg, M. Ferencik, E. J. Schmidt, et al.
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance With T2-Weighted Imaging Improves Detection of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department
Circulation, August 19, 2008; 118(8): 837 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C M TONGE, R C FERNANDEZ, and M T HARBINSON
Current issues in nuclear cardiology
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 270 - 274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Schwitter, C. M. Wacker, A. C. van Rossum, M. Lombardi, N. Al-Saadi, H. Ahlstrom, T. Dill, H. B.W. Larsson, S. D. Flamm, M. Marquardt, et al.
MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 480 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J P Greenwood, J F Younger, J P Ridgway, M U Sivananthan, S G Ball, and S Plein
Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction
Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1363 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. R. Nandalur, B. A. Dwamena, A. F. Choudhri, M. R. Nandalur, and R. C. Carlos
Diagnostic Performance of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1343 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Ebeling Barbier, T. Bjerner, T. Hansen, J. Andersson, L. Lind, J. Hulthe, L. Johansson, and H. Ahlstrom
Clinically Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction Detected at MR Imaging May Not Be Associated with Atherosclerosis
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 103 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, J. Nunez, L. Mainar, J. V. Monmeneu, O. Husser, E. Dominguez, F. J. Chorro, and A. Llacer
Prognostic Value of Dipyridamole Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2007; 50(12): 1174 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Jahnke, E. Nagel, R. Gebker, T. Kokocinski, S. Kelle, R. Manka, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch
Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Tests: Adenosine Stress Perfusion and Dobutamine Stress Wall Motion Imaging
Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1769 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
C. B. Marcu, A. M. Beek, and A. C. van Rossum
Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 10, 2006; 175(8): 911 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.