JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1346-1349, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.053 (Published online 13 March 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.11.053v1
47/7/1346    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JACC
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rathore, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Krumholz, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rathore, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Krumholz, H. M.

VIEWPOINT AND COMMENTARY

Regionalization of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Care

Putting a National Policy in Proper Perspective

Saif S. Rathore, MPH*, Andrew J. Epstein, PhD, MPP{dagger}, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH|| and Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM*,{dagger},{ddagger},§,*

* Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
{dagger} Section of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
{ddagger} Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
§ Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
|| Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Manuscript received September 9, 2005; revised manuscript received November 6, 2005, accepted November 8, 2005.

* Address correspondence to: Dr. Harlan M. Krumholz, Yale University School of Medicine, Internal Medicine, PO Box 208088, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. (Email: harlan.krumholz{at}yale.edu).

A uniform policy for regionalization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care raises several concerns. Transferring all STEMI patients to obtain primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be less effective than transferring only high-risk STEMI patients. Delays in time to treatment >60 min associated with transferring patients for primary PCI may result in increased mortality for the average patient as compared with providing immediate fibrinolytic therapy at their initial hospital; yet more than 95% of patients transferred for primary PCI in the U.S. exceed this 60-min benchmark. Superior outcomes associated with treatment at higher-volume regional STEMI centers are inconsistent among centers, and there is no direct evidence that patients will benefit by a transfer to a high-volume hospital from a low-volume hospital. Published data suggest as many as 800 PCI patients would need to be transferred to a high-volume PCI hospital to avoid a single death at a low-volume PCI hospital. Although European randomized trial data suggest transferring patients with STEMI for primary PCI may be superior to immediate fibrinolytic therapy, these findings are unlikely to generalize to the U.S. health care system given size, geography, and organization. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction care regionalization would require a massive redistribution of health care resources, depriving several hospitals of advanced cardiac care facilities, expertise, and associated revenue. Clearer evidence of the benefits and discussion of potential harms are needed before adopting a national STEMI regionalization policy.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndromes
  EMS = emergency medical services
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction


Related articles in JACC:

ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Recommendations on Triage of Patients to Heart Attack Centers: Is it Time for a National Policy for the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
Timothy D. Henry, James M. Atkins, Michael S. Cunningham, Gary S. Francis, William J. Groh, Robert A. Hong, Karl B. Kern, David M. Larson, Erik Magnus Ohman, Joseph P. Ornato, Mary Ann Peberdy, Michael J. Rosenberg, and W. Douglas Weaver
JACC 2006 47: 1339-1345. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. E. Boden, K. Eagle, and C. B. Granger
Reperfusion Strategies in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Management Options
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 917 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. J. Kiernan, H. H. Ting, and B. J. Gersh
Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: current concepts, promises, and pitfalls
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1545 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.