HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: j.jacc.2005.11.045v1 47/6/1161    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JACC Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stecker, E. C. Articles by Chugh, S. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stecker, E. C. Articles by Chugh, S. S.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: LV FUNCTION AND RISK

Population-Based Analysis of Sudden Cardiac Death With and Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Two-Year Findings from the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study

Heart Rhythm Research Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon

Manuscript received September 4, 2005; revised manuscript received October 17, 2005, accepted November 20, 2005.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sumeet S. Chugh, Cardiology Division, UHN-62, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97239. (Email: chughs{at}ohsu.edu).

Presented in part at the American College of Cardiology 2005 Annual Scientific Sessions (2005 Young Investigator Award to ECS for this manuscript).

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the contribution of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction toward occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population, and to identify distinguishing characteristics of SCD in the absence of LV dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Patients who manifest warning symptoms and signs are more likely to undergo evaluation before SCD. Although prevalence of LV dysfunction in this subgroup may overestimate the prevalence in overall SCD, this is the only means of assessment in the general population.

METHODS: All cases of SCD in Multnomah County, Oregon (population 660,486; 2002 to 2004) were prospectively ascertained in the ongoing Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. We retrospectively assessed LV ejection fraction (LVEF) among subjects who underwent evaluation of LV function before SCD (normal: 55%; mildly to moderately reduced: 36% to 54%; and severely reduced: 35%). Of a total of 714 SCD cases (annual incidence 54 per 100,000), LV function was assessed in 121 (17%).

RESULTS: The LVEF was severely reduced in 36 patients (30%), mildly to moderately reduced in 27 (22%), and normal in 58 (48%). Patients with normal LVEF were distinguishable by younger age (66 ± 15 years vs. 74 ± 10 years; p = 0.001), higher proportion of females (47% vs. 27%; p = 0.025), higher prevalence of seizure disorder (14% vs. 0%; p = 0.002), and lower prevalence of established coronary artery disease (50% vs. 81%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In this community-wide study, only one-third of the evaluated SCD cases had severe LV dysfunction meeting current criteria for prophylactic cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The SCD cases with normal LV function had several distinguishing clinical characteristics. These findings support the aggressive development of alternative screening methods to enhance identification of patients at risk.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   ARVD = arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia   CAD = coronary artery disease   ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator   LV = left ventricular   LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction   MI = myocardial infarction   SCD = sudden cardiac death

Related articles in JACC:

Lessons From a Population: The Limitations of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as the Major Determinant for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

William J. Groh
JACC 2006 47: 1167-1168. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. E. Buxton, K. L. Lee, G. E. Hafley, L. A. Pires, J. D. Fisher, M. R. Gold, M. E. Josephson, M. H. Lehmann, E. N. Prystowsky, and for the MUSTT Investigators Limitations of Ejection Fraction for Prediction of Sudden Death Risk in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Lessons From the MUSTT Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2007; 50(12): 1150 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Chugh, K. Reinier, and E. C. Stecker Learning From a Real-World Analysis of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients: Comorbidities Matter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 26, 2007; 49(25): 2416 - 2418. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Piccirillo, D. Magri, S. Matera, M. Magnanti, A. Torrini, E. Pasquazzi, E. Schifano, S. Velitti, V. Marigliano, R. Quaglione, et al. QT variability strongly predicts sudden cardiac death in asymptomatic subjects with mild or moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a prospective study Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2007; 28(11): 1344 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Groh Lessons From a Population: The Limitations of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as the Major Determinant for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 21, 2006; 47(6): 1167 - 1168. [Full Text] [PDF]