Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:930-932, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.070 (Published online 8 February 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.09.070v1
47/5/930    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felker, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felker, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J. G.

VIEWPOINT

Same Bridge, New Destinations

Rethinking Paradigms for Mechanical Cardiac Support in Heart Failure

G. Michael Felker, MD, MHS, FACC* and Joseph G. Rogers, MD, FACC

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

Manuscript received August 30, 2005; accepted September 29, 2005.

* Address reprint requests: Dr. G. Michael Felker, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Room 0311 Terrace Level, Durham, North Carolina 27705. (Email: michael.felker{at}duke.edu).

Mechanical cardiac support with ventricular assist devices is an established therapy for a variety of clinical scenarios, including postcardiotomy shock, "bridge to transplant," and "destination therapy." At present, device development, clinical trial design, regulatory approval, and reimbursement decisions for the clinical application of mechanical cardiac support devices continue to be considered in the context of these clinical indications. Although understandable from a historical perspective, these arbitrary divisions are inconsistent with the clinical realities of advanced heart failure therapy. By narrowly focusing on transplant eligibility at a static point in the clinical course, current guidelines impede the broader application of ventricular assist device technology to the growing population of patients who may benefit from this therapy.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  REMATCH = Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure
  VAD = ventricular assist device




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. F. Hernandez, B. G. Hammill, and L. H. Curtis
Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices--Reply
JAMA, April 22, 2009; 301(16): 1658 - 1658.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. K. Parides, A. J. Moskowitz, D. D. Ascheim, E. A. Rose, and A. C. Gelijns
Progress versus precision: challenges in clinical trial design for left ventricular assist devices.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 1140 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement