VIEWPOINT
Same Bridge, New Destinations
Rethinking Paradigms for Mechanical Cardiac Support in Heart Failure
G. Michael Felker, MD, MHS, FACC* and
Joseph G. Rogers, MD, FACC
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
Manuscript received August 30, 2005;
accepted September 29, 2005.
* Address reprint requests: Dr. G. Michael Felker, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Room 0311 Terrace Level, Durham, North Carolina 27705. (Email: michael.felker{at}duke.edu).
Mechanical cardiac support with ventricular assist devices is an established therapy for a variety of clinical scenarios, including postcardiotomy shock, "bridge to transplant," and "destination therapy." At present, device development, clinical trial design, regulatory approval, and reimbursement decisions for the clinical application of mechanical cardiac support devices continue to be considered in the context of these clinical indications. Although understandable from a historical perspective, these arbitrary divisions are inconsistent with the clinical realities of advanced heart failure therapy. By narrowly focusing on transplant eligibility at a static point in the clinical course, current guidelines impede the broader application of ventricular assist device technology to the growing population of patients who may benefit from this therapy.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | REMATCH = Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure | | VAD = ventricular assist device |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Pitsis and A. N. Visouli
Chapter 52 Cardiac surgery and transplantation in acute heart failure
The ESC Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac Care,
December 1, 2010;
1(1):
med-9780199584314-chapter - med-9780199584314-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Hernandez, B. G. Hammill, and L. H. Curtis
Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices--Reply
JAMA,
April 22, 2009;
301(16):
1658 - 1658.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Parides, A. J. Moskowitz, D. D. Ascheim, E. A. Rose, and A. C. Gelijns
Progress versus precision: challenges in clinical trial design for left ventricular assist devices.
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2006;
82(3):
1140 - 1146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|