|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1018-1023, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.077
(Published online 8 February 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,*





* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Mayo Echocardiography Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Manuscript received May 9, 2005; revised manuscript received August 3, 2005, accepted August 9, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Teresa S. M. Tsang, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. (Email: tsang.teresa{at}mayo.edu).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare left atrial (LA) volume to LA area and diameter for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The incremental value of LA volume compared with LA area or diameter as a cardiovascular risk marker has not been evaluated prospectively for patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: Left atrial size was assessed with biplane LA volume, four-chamber LA area, and M-mode dimension for 423 patients (mean age 71 ± 8 years, 56% men) who were prospectively followed for development of first AF, congestive heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death.
RESULTS: Of the 317 subjects in sinus rhythm at baseline, 62 had 90 new events during a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 2.3 years. All three LA size parameters were independently predictive of combined outcomes (all p < 0.0001). The overall performance for the prediction of cardiovascular events was greatest for LA volume (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve: indexed LA volume 0.71; LA area 0.64; LA diameter 0.59). A graded association between the degree of LA enlargement and risk of cardiovascular events was only evident for indexed LA volume. For subjects with AF, there was no association between LA size and cardiovascular events.
CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial volume is a more robust marker of cardiovascular events than LA area or diameter in subjects with sinus rhythm. The predictive utility of LA size for cardiovascular events in AF was poor, irrespective of the method of LA size quantitation.
| ||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Garza, P. A. Pellikka, V. K. Somers, M. G. Sarr, J. B. Seward, M. L. Collazo-Clavell, E. Oehler, and F. Lopez-Jimenez Major weight loss prevents long-term left atrial enlargement in patients with morbid and extreme obesity Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 587 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Antonini-Canterin, C C Beladan, B A Popescu, C Ginghina, A C Popescu, R Piazza, E Leiballi, B Zingone, and G L Nicolosi Left atrial remodelling early after mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 759 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Farzaneh-Far and N. B. Schiller Left atrial dimension in stress echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 514 - 515. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F Tops, E. E van der Wall, M. J Schalij, and J. J Bax Multi-modality imaging to assess left atrial size, anatomy and function Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1461 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Paulus, C. Tschope, J. E. Sanderson, C. Rusconi, F. A. Flachskampf, F. E. Rademakers, P. Marino, O. A. Smiseth, G. De Keulenaer, A. F. Leite-Moreira, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2539 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bangalore, S.-S. Yao, and F. A. Chaudhry Role of Left Atrial Size in Risk Stratification and Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Stress Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 25, 2007; 50(13): 1254 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tumminello, P. Lancellotti, M. Lempereur, V. D'Orio, and L. A. Pierard Determinants of pulmonary artery hypertension at rest and during exercise in patients with heart failure Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2007; 28(5): 569 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, R. S. Vasan, M. J. Keyes, H. Parise, T. J. Wang, M. G. Larson, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, W. B. Kannel, D. Levy, and E. J. Benjamin Pulse Pressure and Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation JAMA, February 21, 2007; 297(7): 709 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gerdts, K. Wachtell, P. Omvik, J. E. Otterstad, L. Oikarinen, K. Boman, B. Dahlof, and R. B. Devereux Left Atrial Size and Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events During Antihypertensive Treatment: Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Trial Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 311 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Manning and E. V. Gelfand Left Atrial Size and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: The Volume of Evidence Suggests it Is Time to Break an Old Habit J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 787 - 789. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Abhayaratna, J. B. Seward, C. P. Appleton, P. S. Douglas, J. K. Oh, A. J. Tajik, and T. S.M. Tsang Left Atrial Size: Physiologic Determinants and Clinical Applications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2357 - 2363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |