|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:715-718, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.075
(Published online 6 February 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* New York Methodist Hospital-Cornell Heart Center, Brooklyn New York
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
Manuscript received April 8, 2005; revised manuscript received July 29, 2005, accepted August 12, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Joseph A. Puma, New York Methodist Hospital-Cornell Heart Center, 506 6th Street, 2 Buckley Pavilion, Brooklyn, New York 11215. (Email: joepuma1{at}aol.com).
OBJECTIVES: In order to determine a differential benefit from treatment, we compared the long-term outcome of high-risk versus low-risk patients and evaluated survival free from death or myocardial infarction at one year.
BACKGROUND: Newer anticoagulant strategies during percutaneous coronary intervention have necessitated a reanalysis of the role of intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy trial randomized 2,064 patients undergoing nonurgent coronary stent implantation to eptifibatide or placebo.
METHODS: High-risk characteristics were defined as age >75 years, diabetes, elevated cardiac markers, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 7 days, or unstable angina within 48 h of randomization. Age <5 years, absence of diabetes, and any other reason for admission were considered low risk characterstics.
RESULTS: There were 1,018 patients in the high-risk group (50.8% eptifibatide, 49.2% placebo) and 1,045 patients in the low-risk group (50.0% eptifibatide, 50.0% placebo). Baseline demographics were similar in both groups except for more hypertension (63% vs. 55%, respectively), peripheral vascular disease (8.2% vs. 5.2%, respectively), prior stroke (5.5% vs. 3.2%, respectively), and female gender (33% vs. 22%, respectively) in the high-risk than the low-risk group. At one year, the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction occurred in 15.89% of placebo patients and 7.99% of eptifibatide patients in the high-risk group and 9.02% of the placebo and 8.11% of eptifibatide patients in the low-risk group.
CONCLUSIONS: Although eptifibatide treatment improved outcomes for all patients, preprocedural clinical characteristics can define a subgroup of patients who may derive greatest benefit from its use during coronary stent placement.
| |||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Valina, K. Pinkernell, Y.-H. Song, X. Bai, S. Sadat, R. J. Campeau, T. H. Le Jemtel, and E. Alt Intracoronary administration of autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells improves left ventricular function, perfusion, and remodelling after acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2667 - 2677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo and G. Stankovic The Value of Selectivity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 719 - 720. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |