CLINICAL RESEARCH: PLATELET INHIBITION
Randomized Comparison of Upstream Tirofiban Versus Downstream High Bolus Dose Tirofiban or Abciximab on Tissue-Level Perfusion and Troponin Release in High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
The EVEREST Trial
Leonardo Bolognese, MD, FESC*,
Giovanni Falsini, MD,
Francesco Liistro, MD,
Paolo Angioli, MD,
Kenneth Ducci, MD,
Tamara Taddei, MD,
Roberto Tarducci, MD,
Franco Cosmi, MD,
Silvia Baldassarre, MD and
Antonio Burali, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera Arezzo, Arezzo, Italy.
Manuscript received November 26, 2004;
revised manuscript received January 26, 2005,
accepted February 8, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Leonardo Bolognese, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Arezzo Via P. Nenni n. 22, 52100 Arezzo, Italy. (Email: leonardobolognese{at}hotmail.com).
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban and abciximab on tissue level perfusion and troponin I release in high-risk nonST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Optimal timing and dosage of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for ACS remain to be explored.
METHODS: We randomized 93 high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI to receive upstream (in the coronary care unit) tirofiban, downstream (just prior to PCI) HDB tirofiban, and downstream abciximab. We evaluated the effects of the three drug regimens on tissue-level perfusion using the corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) before and immediately after PCI and after cardiac troponin I (cTnI).
RESULTS: The TMPG 0/1 perfusion was significantly less frequent with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban and abciximab both before (28.1% vs. 66.7% vs. 71%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and after PCI (6.2% vs. 20% vs. 35.5%, respectively; p = 0.015). Upstream tirofiban was also associated with a significantly higher MCE score index (0.88 ± 0.18 vs. 0.77 ± 0.32 vs. 0.71 ± 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05). Post-procedural cTnI elevation was significantly less frequent among patients in the upstream tirofiban group compared with the HDB tirofiban and abciximab groups (9.4% vs. 30% vs. 38.7%, respectively; p = 0.018). The cTnI levels after PCI were significantly lower with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban (3.8 ± 4.1 vs. 7.2 ± 12; p = 0.015) and abciximab (3.8 ± 4.1 vs. 9 ± 13.8; p = 0.0002)
CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk nonST-segment-elevation ACS patients treated with an early invasive strategy, upstream tirofiban is associated with improved tissue-level perfusion and attenuated myocardial damage.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ACS = acute coronary syndrome | | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CCU = coronary care unit | | cTFC = corrected TIMI frame count | | cTnI = cardiac troponin I | | GP = glycoprotein | | HDB = high-dose bolus | | MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography | | NSTE-ACS = nonST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | TACTICS-TIMI 18 = Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 18 | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction | | TMPG = TIMI myocardial perfusion grade |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Valgimigli, G. Biondi-Zoccai, M. Tebaldi, A. W.J. van 't Hof, G. Campo, C. Hamm, J. ten Berg, L. Bolognese, F. Saia, G. B. Danzi, et al.
Tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
Eur. Heart J.,
September 14, 2009;
(2009)
ehp376v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Bonaca, P. G. Steg, L. J. Feldman, J. F. Canales, J. J. Ferguson, L. Wallentin, R. M. Califf, R. A. Harrington, and R. P. Giugliano
Antithrombotics in acute coronary syndromes.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 8, 2009;
54(11):
969 - 984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Giugliano, J. A. White, C. Bode, P. W. Armstrong, G. Montalescot, B. S. Lewis, A. van `t Hof, L. G. Berdan, K. L. Lee, J. T. Strony, et al.
Early versus Delayed, Provisional Eptifibatide in Acute Coronary Syndromes
N. Engl. J. Med.,
May 21, 2009;
360(21):
2176 - 2190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Fang, Yeun Tarl Fresner NgJao, Yi Chen, C.-L. Yu, and S.-P. Wang
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor (Tirofiban) in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Angiology,
April 1, 2009;
60(2):
192 - 200.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Valgimigli, G. Campo, G. Percoco, L. Bolognese, C. Vassanelli, S. Colangelo, N. de Cesare, A. E. Rodriguez, M. Ferrario, R. Moreno, et al.
Comparison of Angioplasty With Infusion of Tirofiban or Abciximab and With Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting or Uncoated Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The MULTISTRATEGY Randomized Trial
JAMA,
April 16, 2008;
299(15):
1788 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 17, 2007;
50(3):
270 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Dudek, A. Dziewierz, B. Chyrchel, L. Polonski, J. Legutko, and J. S. Dubiel
Antiplatelet treatment in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (ISAR-REACT 2 insight)
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
February 1, 2007;
9(suppl_A):
A25 - A31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Kereiakes and E. M. Antman
Clinical Guidelines and Practice: In Search of the Truth
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 19, 2006;
48(6):
1129 - 1135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Giugliano and E. Braunwald
The Year in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 18, 2006;
48(2):
386 - 395.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Upstream vs. Downstream GPIIb/IIIa Inhibition in ACS
Journal Watch Cardiology,
March 16, 2006;
2006(316):
3 - 3.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|