EXPEDITED REVIEW
The Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-stress/benestent Disease (SCANDSTENT) Trial
Henning Kelbæk, MD*,*,
Leif Thuesen, MD ,
Steffen Helqvist, MD*,
Lene Kløvgaard, RN*,
Erik Jørgensen, MD*,
Samir Aljabbari, MD*,
Kari Saunamäki, MD*,
Lars R. Krusell, MD,
Gunnar V.H. Jensen, MD ,
Hans E. Bøtker, MD,
Jens F. Lassen, MD,
Henning R. Andersen, MD,
Per Thayssen, MD ,
Anders Galløe, MD||,
Anton van Weert, PhD¶ for the SCANDSTENT Investigators
* Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Skejby Sygehus, Skejby, Denmark
Roskilde Amtssygehus, Roskilde, Denmark
Odense Universitets hospital, Odense, Denmark
|| Gentofte Amtssygehus, Gentofte, Denmark
¶ Heart Core, Leiden, the Netherlands
Manuscript received September 6, 2005;
revised manuscript received September 27, 2005,
accepted October 11, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Henning Kelbæk, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory 2013, Rigshospitalet, DK–2100, Copenhagen, Denmark (Email: henning.kelbaek{at}rh.hosp.dk).
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the SCANDSTENT study was to evaluate the use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in complex coronary lesions.
BACKGROUND: The use of SES improves angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in simple coronary artery lesions, but there is limited evidence of their safety and efficacy when implanted in complex lesions.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 322 patients with symptomatic complex coronary artery disease to receive either SES or BMS. The lesions were occluded (36%), bifurcational (34%), ostial (22%), or angulated (8%) in morphology. The primary end point was the difference in minimal lumen diameter six months after stent implantation.
RESULTS: The patients were well matched in terms of demographic and angiographic baseline characteristics; 18% had diabetes. The reference vessel diameter was 2.86 mm in mean, and the lesion length 18.0 mm. At follow-up, patients who received SES had a minimal lumen diameter of 2.48 mm compared with 1.65 mm in those who received BMS (p < 0.001), a diameter stenosis of 19.3% versus 43.8% (p < 0.001), and 2.0% versus 31.9% developed restenosis (p < 0.001). The rate of major adverse cardiac events was 4.3% with SES versus 29.3% with BMS (p < 0.001), and stent thrombosis was observed in 0.6% in the SES group versus 3.1% in the BMS group (p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of SES markedly reduced restenosis and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with complex coronary artery lesions without increasing the risk of stent thrombosis.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BMS = bare-metal stent | | LL = late (lumen) loss | | MLD = minimal lumen diameter | | SES = sirolimus-eluting stent | | TLR = target lesion revascularization |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. E. Forman, D. A. Cox, S. G. Ellis, J. M. Lasala, J. A. Ormiston, G. W. Stone, M. A. Turco, J. Y. Wei, A. A. Joshi, K. D. Dawkins, et al.
Long-Term Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Outcomes in Elderly Patients
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
June 1, 2009;
2(3):
178 - 187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bifurcation Stenting With the Crush Versus the Culotte Technique Using Sirolimus Eluting Stents: The Nordic Stent Technique Study
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
February 1, 2009;
2(1):
27 - 34.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Lassen
Two stent or not two stent--that is the question
Eur. Heart J.,
December 1, 2008;
29(23):
2829 - 2830.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kelbaek, L. Thuesen, S. Helqvist, P. Clemmensen, L. Klovgaard, A. Kaltoft, B. Andersen, H. Thuesen, T. Engstrom, H. E. Botker, et al.
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Eight-Month Follow-Up in the Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DEDICATION) Trial
Circulation,
September 9, 2008;
118(11):
1155 - 1162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kelbaek, L. Klovgaard, S. Helqvist, J. F. Lassen, L. R. Krusell, T. Engstrom, H. E. Botker, E. Jorgensen, K. Saunamaki, S. Aljabbari, et al.
Long-Term Outcome in Patients Treated With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Complex Coronary Artery Lesions: 3-Year Results of the SCANDSTENT (Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 27, 2008;
51(21):
2011 - 2016.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. V. Anderson
Drug-Eluting Stents: Life Insurance With a Better Death Benefit
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 27, 2008;
51(21):
2025 - 2027.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Cyrus, H. Zhang, J. S. Allen, T. A. Williams, G. Hu, S. D. Caruthers, S. A. Wickline, and G. M. Lanza
Intramural Delivery of Rapamycin With {alpha}v{beta}3-Targeted Paramagnetic Nanoparticles Inhibits Stenosis After Balloon Injury
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
May 1, 2008;
28(5):
820 - 826.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Kip, K. Hollabaugh, O. C. Marroquin, and D. O. Williams
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 19, 2008;
51(7):
701 - 707.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Grines
Off-label use of drug-eluting stents putting it in perspective.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 12, 2008;
51(6):
615 - 617.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Austin, J. P Pell, and K. G Oldroyd
Drug-eluting stents: do the risks really outweigh the benefits?
Heart,
February 1, 2008;
94(2):
127 - 128.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 17, 2007;
50(3):
270 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Moreno, C. Fernandez, A. Sanchez-Recalde, G. Galeote, L. Calvo, F. Alfonso, R. Hernandez, R. Sanchez-Aquino, D. J. Angiolillo, S. Villarreal, et al.
Clinical impact of in-stent late loss after drug-eluting coronary stent implantation
Eur. Heart J.,
July 1, 2007;
28(13):
1583 - 1591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. H Wong, S. Wan, and M. J Underwood
Myocardial Revascularization: Surgery or Stenting?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann,
June 1, 2007;
15(3):
264 - 269.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Maeng, L. Okkels Jensen, K. Rasmussen, J. Flensted Lassen, L. Romer Krusell, P. Thayssen, and L. Thuesen
Target lesion revascularisation in patients treated with a sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stent
Heart,
June 1, 2007;
93(6):
694 - 697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, J. Pache, C. Kaiser, M. Valgimigli, H. Kelbaek, M. Menichelli, M. Sabate, M. J. Suttorp, D. Baumgart, et al.
Analysis of 14 Trials Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents with Bare-Metal Stents
N. Engl. J. Med.,
March 8, 2007;
356(10):
1030 - 1039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Jorgensen and S. Helqvist
Stent treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions
Eur. Heart J.,
February 2, 2007;
28(4):
383 - 385.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 30, 2007;
49(4):
509 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. K. Steigen, M. Maeng, R. Wiseth, A. Erglis, I. Kumsars, I. Narbute, P. Gunnes, J. Mannsverk, O. Meyerdierks, S. Rotevatn, et al.
Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation Study
Circulation,
October 31, 2006;
114(18):
1955 - 1961.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Ripa, E. Jorgensen, Y. Wang, J. J. Thune, J. C. Nilsson, L. Sondergaard, H. E. Johnsen, L. Kober, P. Grande, and J. Kastrup
Stem Cell Mobilization Induced by Subcutaneous Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor to Improve Cardiac Regeneration After Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Result of the Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Stem Cells in Myocardial Infarction (STEMMI) Trial
Circulation,
April 25, 2006;
113(16):
1983 - 1992.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
