CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
A Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis
Results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) Trial
Fernando Alfonso, MD*,*,
Maria-José Pérez-Vizcayno, MD*,
Rosana Hernandez, MD*,
Armando Bethencourt, MD ,
Vicens Martí, MD ,
Jose R. López-Mínguez, MD ,
Juan Angel, MD||,
Ramón Mantilla, MD¶,
Cesar Morís, MD#,
Angel Cequier, MD**,
Manel Sabaté, MD*,
Javier Escaned, MD*,
Raúl Moreno, MD*,
Camino Bañuelos, MD*,
Alfonso Suárez, MD*,
Carlos Macaya, MD* for the RIBS-II Investigators
* Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Son Dureta University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
San Pablo University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Badajoz, Spain
|| Valle de Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
¶ Meixoeiro University Hospital, Vigo, Spain
# Central Asturias University Hospital, Oviedo, Spain
** Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
Manuscript received August 21, 2005;
revised manuscript received October 14, 2005,
accepted October 25, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Fernando Alfonso, Cardiología Intervencionista, Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Universitario "San Carlos," Ciudad Universitaria, Plaza de Cristo Rey, Madrid 28040, Spain. (Email: falf{at}hotmail.com).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).
BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge.
METHODS: The Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) study is a multicenter randomized trial conducted in 150 patients with ISR (76 allocated to SES and 74 to balloon angioplasty [BA]). The primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at nine months. Secondary end points included prespecified subgroup analysis, lumen volume on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and a composite of major clinical events at one year.
RESULTS: Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. At 9-month angiographic follow-up (96% of eligible patients) minimal lumen diameter was larger (2.52 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 2.09 to 2.81] vs. 1.54 mm [IQR 0.91 to 2.05]; p < 0.001) and recurrent restenosis rate was lower (11% vs. 39%; p < 0.001) in the SES group. Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measure. Lumen volume on IVUS at 9 months was also larger (279 mm3 [IQR 227 to 300] vs. 197 mm3 [IQR 177 to 230]; p < 0.001) in the SES group. At one-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), the event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) was significantly improved in the SES group (88% vs. 69%; p < 0.004) as the result of a lower requirement for target vessel revascularization (11% vs. 30%; p < 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, the use of SES provides superior long-term clinical, angiographic, and IVUS outcome than BA treatment.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BA = balloon angioplasty | | IQR = interquartile range | | ISR = in-stent restenosis | | IVUS = intravascular ultrasound | | PCI = percutaneous coronary interventions | | RIBS-II = Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting study | | SES = sirolimus-eluting stents |
|
Related Article
-
Treatment of Stent Restenosis: Moving Beyond Momentum
- Harold L. Dauerman
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006 47: 2161-2163.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Alfonso, J. Dutary, M. Paulo, and M. J. Perez-Vizcayno
Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons for Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
June 1, 2011;
4(6):
716 - 716.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Dangas, B. E. Claessen, A. Caixeta, E. A. Sanidas, G. S. Mintz, and R. Mehran
In-Stent Restenosis in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 30, 2010;
56(23):
1897 - 1907.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Garg and P. W. Serruys
Coronary Stents: Current Status
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 31, 2010;
56(10_Suppl_S):
S1 - S42.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Teirstein
Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: An Uncommon Yet Pervasive Problem
Circulation,
July 6, 2010;
122(1):
5 - 7.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Abe, T. Kimura, T. Morimoto, T. Taniguchi, F. Yamanaka, K. Nakao, N. Yagi, N. Kokubu, Y. Kasahara, Y. Kataoka, et al.
Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Insights From the j-Cypher Registry
Circulation,
July 6, 2010;
122(1):
42 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Alfonso
Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: The New Pilgrimage: Quo Vadis?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 15, 2010;
55(24):
2717 - 2720.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mehilli, R. A. Byrne, K. Tiroch, S. Pinieck, S. Schulz, S. Kufner, S. Massberg, K.-L. Laugwitz, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, et al.
Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Coronary Restenosis in Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: The ISAR-DESIRE 2 (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stents for In-Stent Restenosis 2) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 15, 2010;
55(24):
2710 - 2716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Liistro, M. Fineschi, S. Grotti, P. Angioli, A. Carrera, K. Ducci, T. Gori, G. Falsini, C. Pierli, and L. Bolognese
Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Sirolimus Stent Implantation for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Results of the TRUE (Tuscany Registry of Sirolimus for Unselected In-Stent Restenosis) Registry at 4 Years
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 16, 2010;
55(7):
613 - 616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Caixeta, P. Genereux, G. Dangas, and R. Mehran
Chapter 28 In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era
Oxford Textbook of Interventional Cardiology,
January 1, 2010;
1(1):
med-9780199569083-chapter - med-9780199569083-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kufner, J. Hausleiter, G. Ndrepepa, S. Schulz, O. Bruskina, R. A. Byrne, M. Fusaro, A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, J. Mehilli, et al.
Long-Term Risk of Adverse Outcomes and New Malignancies in Patients Treated With Oral Sirolimus for Prevention of Restenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
November 1, 2009;
2(11):
1142 - 1148.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Alfonso, J. Garcia, M.-J. Perez-Vizcayno, L. Hernando, R. Hernandez, J. Escaned, P. Jimenez-Quevedo, C. Banuelos, and C. Macaya
New Stent Implantation for Recurrences After Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis: Implications of a Third Metal Layer in Human Coronary Arteries
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 8, 2009;
54(11):
1036 - 1038.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Alfonso, M.-J. Perez-Vizcayno, R. Hernandez, A. Bethencourt, V. Marti, J. R. Lopez-Minguez, J. Angel, A. Iniguez, C. Moris, A. Cequier, et al.
Long-Term Clinical Benefit of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: Results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 11, 2008;
52(20):
1621 - 1627.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Habara, K Mitsudo, T Goto, K Kadota, S Fujii, H Yamamoto, H Kato, S Takenaka, Y Fuku, S Hosogi, et al.
The impact of lesion length and vessel size on outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis
Heart,
September 1, 2008;
94(9):
1162 - 1165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Garg, D. J. Cohen, T. Gaziano, and L. Mauri
Balancing the Risks of Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis in Bare-Metal Versus Drug-Eluting Stents: Results of a Decision Analytic Model
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 13, 2008;
51(19):
1844 - 1853.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Kip, K. Hollabaugh, O. C. Marroquin, and D. O. Williams
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies: The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 19, 2008;
51(7):
701 - 707.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Grines
Off-Label Use of Drug-Eluting Stents: Putting it in Perspective
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 12, 2008;
51(6):
615 - 617.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 17, 2007;
50(3):
270 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-P. B.-L. Rocca, C. Kaiser, M. Pfisterer, and on behalf of the BASKET Investigators
Targeted stent use in clinical practice based on evidence from the BAsel Stent Cost Effectiveness Trial (BASKET)
Eur. Heart J.,
March 2, 2007;
28(6):
719 - 725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dibra, A. Kastrati, F. Alfonso, M. Seyfarth, M.-J. Perez-Vizcayno, J. Mehilli, and A. Schomig
Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 6, 2007;
49(5):
616 - 623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 30, 2007;
49(4):
509 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Dauerman
Treatment of Stent Restenosis: Moving Beyond Momentum
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 6, 2006;
47(11):
2161 - 2163.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|